Promise FastTrack PCI IDE controller

1999-01-21 Thread David Dawes
I've been playing with a Promise FastTrack RAID (IDE) controller with 3.0-current as of yesterday. Although it is recognised in the PCI bus probe as a "Promise Ultra/33" (it has the same vendor/chip ID as the non-RAID card), the probes in i386/isa/wd.c fail. I added some debugging printfs to the

Re: Promise FastTrack PCI IDE controller

1999-01-21 Thread S�ren Schmidt
It seems David Dawes wrote: > I've been playing with a Promise FastTrack RAID (IDE) controller with > 3.0-current as of yesterday. Although it is recognised in the PCI bus > probe as a "Promise Ultra/33" (it has the same vendor/chip ID as the > non-RAID card), the probes in i386/isa/wd.c fail. I

Re: Promise FastTrack PCI IDE controller

1999-01-21 Thread David Dawes
On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 01:21:03PM +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote: >It seems David Dawes wrote: >> I've been playing with a Promise FastTrack RAID (IDE) controller with >> 3.0-current as of yesterday. Although it is recognised in the PCI bus >> probe as a "Promise Ultra/33" (it has the same vendor/ch

Re: Promise FastTrack PCI IDE controller

1999-01-21 Thread S�ren Schmidt
It seems David Dawes wrote: > > That didn't improve things, but with the patch I got lots of messages > like the following (for a disk attached to the onboard PIIX4): > > wd1: DMA failure, DMA status 0 > > (The box isn't SMP.) Hmm, and it is an uptodate -current system ?? Just use this part the

Re: Promise FastTrack PCI IDE controller

1999-01-21 Thread David Dawes
On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 02:06:22PM +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote: >It seems David Dawes wrote: >> >> That didn't improve things, but with the patch I got lots of messages >> like the following (for a disk attached to the onboard PIIX4): >> >> wd1: DMA failure, DMA status 0 >> >> (The box isn't SMP

Re: Promise FastTrack PCI IDE controller

1999-01-21 Thread S�ren Schmidt
It seems David Dawes wrote: > > >> >I also run the card without its BIOS, as that tends to get in the way. > >> >I think the FastTrack is just an Ultra/33 with another BIOS chip on it. > >> > >> I'll try pulling the BIOS tomorrow. We didn't get this card for it's > >> RAID features anyway. > > >

Re: Promise FastTrack PCI IDE controller

1999-01-22 Thread Bob K
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Søren Schmidt wrote: [snip] > Yep I know, the chipset on the Promise is not initialized to what the > drives support then, its working in a slow (but always working though) > mode. I did plan to change this, and even got the docs for the chips > but it has sunken pretty low o

Re: Promise FastTrack PCI IDE controller

1999-01-22 Thread Bruce Evans
>I've been playing with a Promise FastTrack RAID (IDE) controller with >3.0-current as of yesterday. Although it is recognised in the PCI bus >probe as a "Promise Ultra/33" (it has the same vendor/chip ID as the >non-RAID card), the probes in i386/isa/wd.c fail. I added some debugging >printfs to

Re: Promise FastTrack PCI IDE controller

1999-01-26 Thread David Dawes
On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 11:54:59PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: >>I've been playing with a Promise FastTrack RAID (IDE) controller with >>3.0-current as of yesterday. Although it is recognised in the PCI bus >>probe as a "Promise Ultra/33" (it has the same vendor/chip ID as the >>non-RAID card), the

Re: Promise FastTrack PCI IDE controller

1999-01-27 Thread Bruce Evans
>>Errors in wdreset() for the Promise (at least for the Ultra/33) >>probably mean that du->dk_altport is not initialized properly. (Setting >>... > >There is a problem with the way du->dk_altport is set in wdattach. It >is set correctly in wdprobe, but incorrectly in wdattach. The following >pat