On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:50:45AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
I find the standard arguments used by RCng quite
awkward. In particular, especially for people who
have worked with SysV-style init scripts, it's
We aren't trying to be compatable with SysV. We are compatable with
other BSD's with
I find the standard arguments used by RCng quite
awkward. In particular, especially for people who
have worked with SysV-style init scripts, it's
rather surprising that /etc/rc.d/nfsd stop does
not actually stop the nfsd process. Likewise, 'start'
doesn't actually start the specified system.
I
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:50:45AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
I find the standard arguments used by RCng quite
awkward. In particular, especially for people who
have worked with SysV-style init scripts, it's
rather surprising that /etc/rc.d/nfsd stop does
not actually stop the nfsd process.
Gordon Tetlow writes:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:50:45AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
I find the standard arguments used by RCng quite
awkward. In particular, especially for people who
have worked with SysV-style init scripts, it's
rather surprising that /etc/rc.d/nfsd stop does
Gordon Tetlow wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:50:45AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
I find the standard arguments used by RCng quite
awkward. In particular, ... /etc/rc.d/nfsd stop does
not actually stop the nfsd process. ...
... I've found this behavior to be quite annoying. I'll
see if I
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:23:48PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
Gordon Tetlow wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:50:45AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
I find the standard arguments used by RCng quite
awkward. In particular, ... /etc/rc.d/nfsd stop does
not actually stop the nfsd process. ...
