Re: building ports (well, pkg) and make -j (even -j1 ) on a fast and64 machine: builds fail (head -r325997 context)

Mark Millard wrote: > [Plain "make" works (no -j ).] > > Is it expected that -j1 and the like get what I report below? A bug in the makefile (eg conflict b/w .ORDER and dependencies) will result in that sort of noise. -j1 is still jobs mode

Re: building ports

well, on the advice of someone, i manually edited these files changing the date in them to 2201, before changing it it was 19990308. i dunno if its significant, but i rebuilt using make buildworld, make installworld. and i did run mergemaster afterwards. what date is supposed to be in this

Re: building ports

On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 09:44:26PM -0600, Ishmael wrote: : Your system is too old to use this bsd.port.mk. According to the mail headers, your system clock is about one year behind actual time. That might have screwed up the `make'... Best regards, -- Edwin H. Kremer, senior systems- and

Re: building ports

On Thu, 09 Mar 2000, in a never-ending search for enlightenment, Edwin Kremer wrote: On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 09:44:26PM -0600, Ishmael wrote: : Your system is too old to use this bsd.port.mk. According to the mail headers, your system clock is about one year behind actual time. That

RE: building ports

Howdy, Have a look in bsd.port.mk for the version number that it needs to build with. Then make a copy of /var/db/port.mkversion. Edit /var/db/port.mkversion with the version number that bsd.port.mk requires. I had this same problem when the 34upgrade package had been altered with

Re: Building ports...

Gary D. Margiotta wrote: any given port.? It then tells me the following: fetch: illegal option -- A It seems that you have outdated fetch - update your sources (via cvsup or any other way)? and then do following: # cd /usr/src/lib/libfetch/ # make all install clean # cd