On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 00:25 -0700, Waitman Gobble wrote:
I noticed the machine rebooting randomly every 20 seconds to 5
minutes. Disabling the nvidia driver seems to fix the problem, and I
was able to update after applying ports/177459 patch. The updated
nvidia driver seems to have solved the
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 11:07 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
can you guys please ensure a PR is filed with all the information
you've just included?
the clang team would likely love to have this much information in a bug
report.
Thanks!
adrian
I've started a p/r for this as I
On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 05:52:31 -0700, Sean Bruno seanwbr...@gmail.com wrote:
patch was applied yesterday-ish to ports.
Sean
Awesome thanks for the info, trying it out now. thought it was the .32
patches. I didn't realize it's the updated 310.44 driver.
--
Waitman Gobble
San Jose California
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 10:35:47 +0100, Thomas Sparrevohn
thomas.sparrev...@btinternet.com wrote:
I have had the same problem - it seems like a sysctl call provokes a
overrun in a strlen call. It is not reproducible with a GENERIC kernel with
debugging in my case. However a simple workaround is to
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 11:07:55 -0700, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
can you guys please ensure a PR is filed with all the information
you've just included?
the clang team would likely love to have this much information in a bug report.
Thanks!
adrian
OK is it good to know the
I have had the same problem - it seems like a sysctl call provokes a
overrun in a strlen call. It is not reproducible with a GENERIC kernel with
debugging in my case. However a simple workaround is to compile
nvidia-driver with gcc.
-Original Message-
From:
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 10:35:47 +0100, Thomas Sparrevohn
thomas.sparrev...@btinternet.com wrote:
I have had the same problem - it seems like a sysctl call provokes a
overrun in a strlen call. It is not reproducible with a GENERIC kernel with
debugging in my case. However a simple workaround is to
Hi,
can you guys please ensure a PR is filed with all the information
you've just included?
the clang team would likely love to have this much information in a bug report.
Thanks!
adrian
On 3 April 2013 10:50, Waitman Gobble uzi...@da3m0n8t3r.com wrote:
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 10:35:47 +0100,
