On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Ulrich Spörlein u...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 10:40:45 +0200, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
On 10/19/12 16:36, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
Hi all,
those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
tree by the end of the year.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 04:36:18PM +0200, Ulrich Sprlein wrote:
those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
tree by the end of the year.
...
Should people feel strongly about them, we might be able to move them
over to the doc repository.
This does not seem a RFC --
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 02:53:11PM +0200, C. P. Ghost wrote:
How about converting them to SGML and integrating them into
the Handbook (with the caveat that they are outdated, but
retained for archival purposes)?
I find the Handbook to not look very well due to its SGML nature and one
page per
On 22-10-2012 14:53, C. P. Ghost wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Ulrich Spörlein u...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 10:40:45 +0200, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
On 10/19/12 16:36, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
Hi all,
those roff sources have been very naughty and will be
those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
tree by the end of the year.
...
Should people feel strongly about them, we might be able to move them
over to the doc repository.
This does not seem a RFC -- this sounds more like you or a cabal
already made the
On 10/19/12 16:36, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
Hi all,
those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
tree by the end of the year. Most of those papers are severely out of
date and provide no more use to the system. They can probably also be
found online using a search
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 10:40:45 +0200, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
On 10/19/12 16:36, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
Hi all,
those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
tree by the end of the year. Most of those papers are severely out of
date and provide no more use to
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 12:14:28 -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 19 October 2012 10:36, Ulrich Spörlein u...@freebsd.org wrote:
Should people feel strongly about them, we might be able to move them
over to the doc repository.
Moving them to the doc repo loses the history, for what gain?
You
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 09:24:33 -0700, Gregory Shapiro wrote:
Ulrich Sprlein wrote this message on Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 16:36 +0200:
those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
tree by the end of the year. Most of those papers are severely out of
date and
Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 12:14:28 -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 19 October 2012 10:36, Ulrich Spörlein u...@freebsd.org wrote:
Should people feel strongly about them, we might be able to move them
over to the doc repository.
Moving them to the doc
On Sat, 2012-10-20 at 14:24:28 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 12:14:28 -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 19 October 2012 10:36, Ulrich Spörlein u...@freebsd.org wrote:
Should people feel strongly about them, we might be able to
Hi all,
those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
tree by the end of the year. Most of those papers are severely out of
date and provide no more use to the system. They can probably also be
found online using a search engine of your choice.
Should people feel
On 19 Oct 2012, at 15:36, Ulrich Spörlein u...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi all,
those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
tree by the end of the year. Most of those papers are severely out of
date and provide no more use to the system. They can probably also be
On 10/19/2012 7:45 AM, Mark Blackman wrote:
On 19 Oct 2012, at 15:36, Ulrich Spörlein u...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi all,
those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
tree by the end of the year. Most of those papers are severely out of
date and provide no more use to
Ulrich Sprlein wrote this message on Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 16:36 +0200:
those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
tree by the end of the year. Most of those papers are severely out of
date and provide no more use to the system. They can probably also be
found online
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 08:55:42AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Ulrich Sprlein wrote this message on Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 16:36 +0200:
those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
tree by the end of the year. Most of those papers are severely out of
date and
On 19 October 2012 10:36, Ulrich Spörlein u...@freebsd.org wrote:
Should people feel strongly about them, we might be able to move them
over to the doc repository.
Moving them to the doc repo loses the history, for what gain?
You mention that the roff sources are 'naughty'. Are they holding up
Ulrich Sprlein wrote this message on Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 16:36 +0200:
those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
tree by the end of the year. Most of those papers are severely out of
date and provide no more use to the system. They can probably also be
On 19-10-2012 16:36, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
Hi all,
those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
tree by the end of the year. Most of those papers are severely out of
date and provide no more use to the system. They can probably also be
found online using a search
Ulrich Spörlein u...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi all,
those roff sources have been very naughty and will be removed from the
tree by the end of the year. Most of those papers are severely out of
date and provide no more use to the system. They can probably also be
found online using a search
I guess the real bug is that we've been installing these, but never
referencing them, or telling users where they could find them... I.e.
in man vi:
``An Introduction to Display Editing with Vi'', found in the ``UNIX
User's Manual Supplementary Documents'' section of both
21 matches
Mail list logo
