Re: RFC regarding usage of ISO 8601 throughout the tree

2011-01-06 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 6:40:09 pm Miroslav Lachman wrote: Ulrich Spörlein wrote: On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 19:00:31 +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= wrote: !ACHTUNG BIKESHED ALERT! Hello, With the recent changes to the committer graphs, I again was

Re: RFC regarding usage of ISO 8601 throughout the tree

2011-01-06 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 20:47:49 +0100 Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net wrote: I've long had a mental note to get round to fixing isnd which emits: 05.01.2011 13:15:06 To 2011-01-05 13:15:06 Hehe, isdnd was written by a German, it seems :) How quickly the world forgets :(

Re: RFC regarding usage of ISO 8601 throughout the tree

2011-01-06 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 20:47:49 +0100 Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net wrote: I've long had a mental note to get round to fixing isnd which emits: 05.01.2011 13:15:06 To 2011-01-05 13:15:06 Hehe, isdnd was written by a German, it seems :) How

RFC regarding usage of ISO 8601 throughout the tree

2011-01-05 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
!ACHTUNG BIKESHED ALERT! Hello, With the recent changes to the committer graphs, I again was reminded how much I hate the /MM/DD format (I can't help it ...). Given that this almost looks like ISO 8601, but is an unreadable variant of it, I would like to aggressively change this throughout

Re: RFC regarding usage of ISO 8601 throughout the tree

2011-01-05 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 02:21:55PM +0100, Ulrich Sp??rlein wrote: !ACHTUNG BIKESHED ALERT! Hello, With the recent changes to the committer graphs, I again was reminded how much I hate the /MM/DD format (I can't help it ...). Given that this almost looks like ISO 8601, but is an

Re: RFC regarding usage of ISO 8601 throughout the tree

2011-01-05 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= wrote: !ACHTUNG BIKESHED ALERT! Hello, With the recent changes to the committer graphs, I again was reminded how much I hate the /MM/DD format (I can't help it ...). Given that I guess hope you mean you like linear decreasing order but dislike '/' as

Re: RFC regarding usage of ISO 8601 throughout the tree

2011-01-05 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 19:00:31 +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= wrote: !ACHTUNG BIKESHED ALERT! Hello, With the recent changes to the committer graphs, I again was reminded how much I hate the /MM/DD format (I can't help it ...). Given that I

Re: RFC regarding usage of ISO 8601 throughout the tree

2011-01-05 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Ulrich Spörlein wrote: On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 19:00:31 +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= wrote: !ACHTUNG BIKESHED ALERT! Hello, With the recent changes to the committer graphs, I again was reminded how much I hate the /MM/DD format (I can't help it ...). Given

Re: RFC regarding usage of ISO 8601 throughout the tree

2011-01-05 Thread Rob Farmer
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 05:21, Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net wrote: !ACHTUNG BIKESHED ALERT! Hello, With the recent changes to the committer graphs, I again was reminded how much I hate the /MM/DD format (I can't help it ...). Given that this almost looks like ISO 8601, but is an