Hi Kostik,
On Fri, 9 Dec 2011, 13:56+0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011, 22:21+0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
[...]
Fixed patch is available at
http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/map_datalimit.2.patch
Works as expected without any glitches.
I understand that you are
Hi Kostik,
I understand that you are busy with the release. But is there a plan
to commit this code somewhere in the near future?
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011, 22:21+0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
[...]
Fixed patch is available at
http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/map_datalimit.2.patch
Works as
[...]
Overall, the test is quite curious but absolutely unrealistic.
If there is a realistic one I'm open to use it :-)
Fixed patch is available at
http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/map_datalimit.2.patch
OK, will test and report the results shortly.
--
Maxim Konovalov
[...]
Fixed patch is available at
http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/map_datalimit.2.patch
Works as expected without any glitches.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi Kostik,
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, 11:22+0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
[...]
Anyway, the patch needs testers before I will push it forward.
[igor's email was corrected]
We will test it in out environment and let you know.
It seems I don't understand how it works.
Here is a test program:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 09:38:19PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
Hi Kostik,
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, 11:22+0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
[...]
Anyway, the patch needs testers before I will push it forward.
[igor's email was corrected]
We will test it in out environment and let you
[...]
Anyway, the patch needs testers before I will push it forward.
[igor's email was corrected]
We will test it in out environment and let you know.
Thanks for the patch!
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
I was reminded about the patch I wrote for Igor Sysoev some time ago.
The issue the patch tries to handle is that jemalloc uses mmap() instead
of sbrk() for pages allocation, and thus RLIMIT_DATA limit is no longer
effective to put the bounds on the process heap. Since reverting to sbrk
for such
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 07:43:57PM +0400, Maxim Dounin wrote:
Hello!
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 02:44:10PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
I was reminded about the patch I wrote for Igor Sysoev some time ago.
The issue the patch tries to handle is that jemalloc uses mmap() instead
of sbrk()
Hello!
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 02:44:10PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
I was reminded about the patch I wrote for Igor Sysoev some time ago.
The issue the patch tries to handle is that jemalloc uses mmap() instead
of sbrk() for pages allocation, and thus RLIMIT_DATA limit is no longer
10 matches
Mail list logo