On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:41:41PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> A 5.0 DP2 branch was created just yesterday. So how ever good
> yesterday's -current was will affect DP2. I rather expected the release
> engineers to at least querry the lists to ask what the known issues are
> before picking whic
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:08:32AM -0400, Rod Smith wrote:
> According to the timetable at
> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.0R/schedule.html, DP2 for FreeBSD 5.0
I've updated that timetable to remove the specific date (it may take
up to 24 hours for the website to be updated). We're activel
David O'Brien wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:28:20AM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> >
> > I think we're on our way to stabilizing -CURRENT enough for a DP2
> > soon. I would sit and wait it out just a tad longer. :-)
>
> A 5.0 DP2 branch was created just yesterday. So how ever good
>
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:28:20AM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
>
> I think we're on our way to stabilizing -CURRENT enough for a DP2
> soon. I would sit and wait it out just a tad longer. :-)
A 5.0 DP2 branch was created just yesterday. So how ever good
yesterday's -current was will affect
I think we're on our way to stabilizing -CURRENT enough for a DP2
soon. I would sit and wait it out just a tad longer. :-)
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:25:29AM -0400, Michael Lucas wrote:
> It's been under discussion for a while now.
>
> Basically, we'll release DP2 when we feel -current is
It's been under discussion for a while now.
Basically, we'll release DP2 when we feel -current is in suitable
shape. :-)
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:08:32AM -0400, Rod Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> According to the timetable at
> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.0R/schedule.html, DP2 for FreeBSD 5.0
