You could do that, rather easily.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Mr. K." writes
:
>what would be even cooler is if we could jail() a user natively at
>login. I bet this patch could be easily modified to use jail() instead of
>chroot().
>
>On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> In
what would be even cooler is if we could jail() a user natively at
login. I bet this patch could be easily modified to use jail() instead of
chroot().
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <051001bf942c$87e3fa40$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Alejandro Ramirez"
> writes:
> >Hi,
> >
ject: Re: Chrooted telnet support in 4.x???
> In message <051001bf942c$87e3fa40$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Alejandro
Ramirez"
> writes:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Will FreeBSD 4.x will be able to chroot telnet sessions natively???, or
are
> >there any plans to integrate this
In message <051001bf942c$87e3fa40$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Alejandro Ramirez"
writes:
>Hi,
>
>Will FreeBSD 4.x will be able to chroot telnet sessions natively???, or are
>there any plans to integrate this patches to the base system:
Investigate the jail(8) facility in 4.x, it is *far* stronger than
