This is the same way that OS servers under Mach3 were developed and debugged!
John
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 04:32:36AM +1000, Matthew Dillon wrote:
I can just see all the coolness seeping out. Now guys, we have to
have as a goal something at least as comparable as what IBM did
with one of their mainframes. Oh, say, lets shoot for being able to
run 4000 copies
Julian Elischer writes:
|
| I have just managed to get the following going:
|
| By writing a device driver that is two terminals back-to-back,
| and configuring vmware to map one of the virtual ttys over the
| 'null-modem' device, and then running a kernel configured with the console
| on com1
:I have just managed to get the following going:
:
:By writing a device driver that is two terminals back-to-back,
:and configuring vmware to map one of the virtual ttys over the
:..
:
:Thus no need to have that second machine for debugging..
::-)
:It's amazing to see on the same X screen,
:1/
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthew Dillon writes:
:I have just managed to get the following going:
:
:By writing a device driver that is two terminals back-to-back,
:and configuring vmware to map one of the virtual ttys over the
:..
:
:Thus no need to have that second machine for debugging..
I'll put the device driver on http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/
but it needs teh eyes of someone who's really at home in the tty system
to look at it. I got kinda confused half way through hacking it (from the
pty driver) and it shows. basically each pair of minor numbers is a pair
and are
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Julian El
ischer writes:
Oh? can you run a kernel in a jail for debugging?
No, not quite yet, but what IBM bragged about the 41k linuxes for
was for what jails do for you.
Poul-Henning
That's what I'm using it for..
(debugging kernel code.. I only have one
Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
| In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Julian
|El
| ischer writes:
|
| Oh? can you run a kernel in a jail for debugging?
|
| No, not quite yet, but what IBM bragged about the 41k linuxes for
| was for what jails do for you.
Nope not quite. Since you could actually crash
