On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:05:25 +0300, Dima Panov wrote:
Ruby is bad?
More like clang is bad, it's a known issue.
clangbsd errors in my blog:
http://dimapanov.wordpress.com/2010/04/29/clangbsd/
at this moment unbuildable some critical ports:
devel/binutils
devel/icu[4]
devel/pcre
lang/ruby1[
On Thursday 29 April 2010 02:40:24 Dima Panov wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 April 2010 23:16:38 Ollivier Robert wrote:
> > According to Dima Panov:
> > > while building lang/ruby18:
> > Which options to you use?
> >
> > _OPTIONS_READ=ruby+oniguruma-1.8.7.248_1,1
> > WITHOUT_ONIGURUMA=true
> > WITH_RDOC
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:32:41PM +0200, Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 02:40:24AM +1100, Dima Panov wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 April 2010 23:16:38 Ollivier Robert wrote:
> > > According to Dima Panov:
> > > > while building lang/ruby18:
> > > Which options to you use?
> > >
> >
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 02:40:24AM +1100, Dima Panov wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 April 2010 23:16:38 Ollivier Robert wrote:
> > According to Dima Panov:
> > > while building lang/ruby18:
> > Which options to you use?
> >
> > _OPTIONS_READ=ruby+oniguruma-1.8.7.248_1,1
> > WITHOUT_ONIGURUMA=true
> > WI
On Wednesday 28 April 2010 23:16:38 Ollivier Robert wrote:
> According to Dima Panov:
> > while building lang/ruby18:
> Which options to you use?
>
> _OPTIONS_READ=ruby+oniguruma-1.8.7.248_1,1
> WITHOUT_ONIGURUMA=true
> WITH_RDOC=true
> WITHOUT_DEBUG=true
>
> I notice your ruby is compiling w/o a
