On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:26:34AM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Stephen McKay wrote:
>
> > >unfortunatly my provider
> > >cut me off and I just got some access back, but not for the location
> > >the ctm machine is located at.
> > >
> > >At this time I do not know yet when it
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Stephen McKay wrote:
> >unfortunatly my provider
> >cut me off and I just got some access back, but not for the location
> >the ctm machine is located at.
> >
> >At this time I do not know yet when it will have access again.
>
> Surely FreeBSD Inc (or whatever it is that own
> Anyway: If CTM was to ever be given up (it's good to read, that Ulf will
> get his CTM box connected again, soon), then there should be a alternate
> access method, that works through tightly configured firewalls. And CVsup
> via SSL might be a good candidate ...
Hmm. Look at sslproxy and sslw
On 2001-03-21 14:59 +0200, Mark Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just an idea:
> >
> > How about a CVSUP via HTTPS server (just as a means to tunnel CVSUP
> > through a HTTPS proxy ...) ?
> >
> > Most probably a CVSUP daemon bound to port 443 would do (there are
> > programs that tunnel ar
On Thursday, 22nd March 2001, Bruce Evans wrote:
>On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Stephen McKay wrote:
>> On the contrary, I prefer CTM over CVSup, even on a fast connection (which
>> I don't currently have). On a slow or intermittent connection, CTM beats
>> CVSup by a large margin.
>
>I'm not sure about
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Stephen McKay wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20th March 2001, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 04:53:33PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>
> >> On 20-Mar-01 Michael C . Wu wrote:
> >> > For all connections greater than 9600baud modems, we recommend
> >> > using CVSup
On a positive note, both Pachell and Covad agree the localloop for
my new DSL is ready, so I hope to see a covad person with router
in the next few days, which would mean I should be up and running
again soon.
--
Regards, Ulf.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 09:44:00PM +1000, Stephen McKay wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20th March 2001, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 04:53:33PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>
> >> On 20-Mar-01 Michael C . Wu wrote:
> >> > For all connections greater than 9600baud modems, we recommen
> Just an idea:
>
> How about a CVSUP via HTTPS server (just as a means to tunnel CVSUP
> through a HTTPS proxy ...) ?
>
> Most probably a CVSUP daemon bound to port 443 would do (there are
> programs that tunnel arbitrary data through a HTTPS proxy, though
> I admit this is cheating ;-)
You s
On Tuesday, 20th March 2001, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 04:53:33PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> On 20-Mar-01 Michael C . Wu wrote:
>> > For all connections greater than 9600baud modems, we recommend
>> > using CVSup to get src-all and ports-all updated. At the worst case,
On 2001-03-19 17:01 -0800, Ulf Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been hosting the machine which ran ctm, unfortunatly my provider
> cut me off and I just got some access back, but not for the location
> the ctm machine is located at.
Ummm, that's bad ...
I had been hoping that CTM de
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 04:53:33PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 20-Mar-01 Michael C . Wu wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 02:07:13AM +0200, Vladimir Kushnir scribbled:
> >| Is there anything wrong with our CTM system now? There doesn't seem to be
> >| any deltas (either src-cur, or ports-c
On 20-Mar-01 Michael C . Wu wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 02:07:13AM +0200, Vladimir Kushnir scribbled:
>| Is there anything wrong with our CTM system now? There doesn't seem to be
>| any deltas (either src-cur, or ports-cur) since Mar 12 :-(
>
> For all connections greater than 9600baud mode
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 02:07:13AM +0200, Vladimir Kushnir scribbled:
| Is there anything wrong with our CTM system now? There doesn't seem to be
| any deltas (either src-cur, or ports-cur) since Mar 12 :-(
For all connections greater than 9600baud modems, we recommend
using CVSup to get src-all
14 matches
Mail list logo
