On Mon, 8 Feb 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> This does not make any operational change except to get rid
> of the $conf_dir junk from rc.conf, which I originally put
> in to try to bootstrap rc.diskless.
>
> A much better way to do rc.diskless was suggested to me,
> which I'm
On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 08:14:55PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> This does not make any operational change except to get rid
> of the $conf_dir junk from rc.conf, which I originally put
> in to try to bootstrap rc.diskless.
>
> A much better way to do rc.diskless was suggested to
< said:
>> A much better way to do rc.diskless was suggested to me,
>> which I'm going to implement. It involves retargeting
>> the /conf/ME softlink by mount_union'ing a small MFS
> Union mounts do not work, and I believe they are some distance from
> working (unless you have better patches th
:>> the /conf/ME softlink by mount_union'ing a small MFS
:
:> Union mounts do not work, and I believe they are some distance from
:> working (unless you have better patches than I do, of course).
:
:Last I checked, union mounts work just fine, thank you very much.
:unionfs (which should have been
< said:
> union mounts are broken. I must have panic'd my test box 50 times
> trying to get them to work.
> Fortunately I found another way using the less sophisticated
> -o union type of mount
That is a union mount. Which is it -- broken or not?
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Woll
Matthew Dillon writes:
> union mounts are broken. I must have panic'd my test box 50 times
> trying to get them to work.
Nonono. The union filesystem ('mount -t union') is broken. Union
mounts ('mount -o union') are not.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubscri
:Matthew Dillon writes:
:> union mounts are broken. I must have panic'd my test box 50 times
:> trying to get them to work.
:
:Nonono. The union filesystem ('mount -t union') is broken. Union
:mounts ('mount -o union') are not.
:
:DES
:--
:Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no
> Fortunately I found another way using the less sophisticated
> -o union type of mount ( verses the more sophisticated mount_union ).
Well, there are problems here too. I had /var/mail mounted with -o union
from another host. My own, local, mailbox would get corrupted every once
in a whil
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > Fortunately I found another way using the less sophisticated
> > -o union type of mount ( verses the more sophisticated mount_union ).
>
> Well, there are problems here too. I had /var/mail mounted with -o union
> from another host. My own,
:> Well, there are problems here too. I had /var/mail mounted with -o union
:> from another host. My own, local, mailbox would get corrupted every once
:> in a while -- lots of \0, some other strings. 16K in size.
:>
:> This is on 3.0-RELEASE, with NFSv3. The server is Solaris.
:
:There were sever
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> >> A much better way to do rc.diskless was suggested to me,
> >> which I'm going to implement. It involves retargeting
> >> the /conf/ME softlink by mount_union'ing a small MFS
* Note this.
>
> > Union mounts do not work, and I believe
11 matches
Mail list logo