On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:42:22PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/15/2011 01:40, Marius Strobl wrote:
>
> > The generated config.h and platform.h for sparc64 are these:
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/bind96_config.h
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/bind96_platform.h
>
> Marius,
>
On 07/15/2011 01:40, Marius Strobl wrote:
> The generated config.h and platform.h for sparc64 are these:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/bind96_config.h
> http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/bind96_platform.h
Marius,
Thanks again for all your help on this. During the work to upgrade to
BIND 9.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 05:31:49PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/14/2011 16:21, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 09:53:42AM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote:
> >> 2011/7/11 KOT MATPOCKuH :
> Oops, sorry, I forgot to revert the previous patch when test-compiling.
> Please re-
On 07/14/2011 16:21, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 09:53:42AM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote:
>> 2011/7/11 KOT MATPOCKuH :
Oops, sorry, I forgot to revert the previous patch when test-compiling.
Please re-fetch sparc64_isc_atomic.h.diff2 and try again.
>>> I started named fro
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 09:53:42AM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote:
> 2011/7/11 KOT MATPOCKuH :
> >> Oops, sorry, I forgot to revert the previous patch when test-compiling.
> >> Please re-fetch sparc64_isc_atomic.h.diff2 and try again.
> > I started named from ports (dns/bind96) at Sat Jul ?9 10:08:41 M
2011/7/11 KOT MATPOCKuH :
>> Oops, sorry, I forgot to revert the previous patch when test-compiling.
>> Please re-fetch sparc64_isc_atomic.h.diff2 and try again.
> I started named from ports (dns/bind96) at Sat Jul 9 10:08:41 MSD,
> and it worked properly till Sun Jul 10 22:25:41 MSD.
> At 22:25:4
2011/7/8 Marius Strobl :
> In order to have a result which can be compared with the base BIND.
> Whether bind98 works or works without the ISC atomic operations says
> nothing about the bind96 port or the base version.
Okey...
> Oops, sorry, I forgot to revert the previous patch when test-compili
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 11:17:20PM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote:
> 2011/7/8 Marius Strobl :
>
> > Please try the following:
> > a) Instead of the base BIND use the dns/bind96 port. The native build
> > ? of the latter defaults to not using the ISC atomic implementation
> > ? on sparc64 (and arm) and
2011/7/8 Marius Strobl :
> Please try the following:
> a) Instead of the base BIND use the dns/bind96 port. The native build
> of the latter defaults to not using the ISC atomic implementation
> on sparc64 (and arm) and should properly enable the alternative. I
> can at least start named fro
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 03:47:08PM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote:
> 2011/7/7 Marius Strobl :
> > That's not the patch I was referring to. I did a second one which just
> > entirely disables the use of atomic operations on sparc64:
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/sparc64_isc_disable_atomic.diff
>
2011/7/7 Marius Strobl :
> That's not the patch I was referring to. I did a second one which just
> entirely disables the use of atomic operations on sparc64:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/sparc64_isc_disable_atomic.diff
Omg. I'm sorry.
I applied this patch and restarted named, but named cras
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 03:44:32PM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote:
> 2011/7/7 Marius Strobl :
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 01:46:23PM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote:
> >> I updated system to r223824 and got named patched to 9.6.-ESV-R4-P3,
> >> but problem is still exists:
> >> 07-Jul-2011 13:24:22.765 gene
2011/7/7 Marius Strobl :
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 01:46:23PM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote:
>> I updated system to r223824 and got named patched to 9.6.-ESV-R4-P3,
>> but problem is still exists:
>> 07-Jul-2011 13:24:22.765 general:
>> /usr/src/lib/bind/dns/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/dns/rbtdb.c:1622
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 01:46:23PM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote:
> I updated system to r223824 and got named patched to 9.6.-ESV-R4-P3,
> but problem is still exists:
> 07-Jul-2011 13:24:22.765 general:
> /usr/src/lib/bind/dns/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/dns/rbtdb.c:1622:
> REQUIRE(prev > 0) failed
>
I updated system to r223824 and got named patched to 9.6.-ESV-R4-P3,
but problem is still exists:
07-Jul-2011 13:24:22.765 general:
/usr/src/lib/bind/dns/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/dns/rbtdb.c:1622:
REQUIRE(prev > 0) failed
07-Jul-2011 13:24:22.781 general: exiting (due to assertion failure)
How c
On 06/29/2011 06:41, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 02:33:06PM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote:
2011/6/29 KOT MATPOCKuH:
I'm got a problem with named on FreeBSD-CURRENT/sparc64.
Up to 5 times a day it crashes with these messages:
27-Jun-2011 03:42:14.384 general:
/usr/src/lib/bind/dns/
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 02:33:06PM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote:
> 2011/6/29 KOT MATPOCKuH :
> >>> I'm got a problem with named on FreeBSD-CURRENT/sparc64.
> >>> Up to 5 times a day it crashes with these messages:
> >>> 27-Jun-2011 03:42:14.384 general:
> >>> /usr/src/lib/bind/dns/../../../contrib/bi
2011/6/29 KOT MATPOCKuH :
>>> I'm got a problem with named on FreeBSD-CURRENT/sparc64.
>>> Up to 5 times a day it crashes with these messages:
>>> 27-Jun-2011 03:42:14.384 general:
>>> /usr/src/lib/bind/dns/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/dns/rbtdb.c:1614:
>>> REQUIRE(prev > 0) failed
>>> 27-Jun-2011 03
2011/6/28 Marius Strobl :
>> I'm got a problem with named on FreeBSD-CURRENT/sparc64.
>> Up to 5 times a day it crashes with these messages:
>> 27-Jun-2011 03:42:14.384 general:
>> /usr/src/lib/bind/dns/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/dns/rbtdb.c:1614:
>> REQUIRE(prev > 0) failed
>> 27-Jun-2011 03:42:1
19 matches
Mail list logo
