Mike Barcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html
Sat Apr 5 03:38:00 EST 2003
U Makefile.inc1
cvs update: ignoring bin/dumplfs (CVS/Repository missing)
cvs update: ignoring contrib/amd/conf/mount (CVS/Repository missing)
cvs [update
Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike Barcroft wrote:
stage 4: building everything..
--
=== share/man/man9
make: don't know how to make bus_Activate_resource.9. Stop
*** Error code 2
This looks like a single bit memory
Mike Barcroft wrote:
stage 4: building everything..
--
=== share/man/man9
make: don't know how to make bus_Activate_resource.9. Stop
*** Error code 2
This looks like a single bit memory error to me. Turn off bit 5 and a
lowercase
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 11:02:53AM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
Mike Barcroft wrote:
stage 4: building everything..
--
=== share/man/man9
make: don't know how to make bus_Activate_resource.9. Stop
*** Error code 2
This looks
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jos Backus writes:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 11:02:53AM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
Mike Barcroft wrote:
stage 4: building everything..
--
=== share/man/man9
make: don't know how to make
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 08:18:48PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jos Backus writes:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 11:02:53AM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
Mike Barcroft wrote:
stage 4: building everything..
Jos Backus wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 11:02:53AM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
Mike Barcroft wrote:
stage 4: building everything..
--
=== share/man/man9
make: don't know how to make bus_Activate_resource.9. Stop
***
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 12:16:39AM -0500, Mike Barcroft wrote:
[...]
--
Kernel build for GENERIC started on Mon Mar 3 00:15:48 EST 2003
--
=== hme
make: don't know how to
I made the suggestion in another forum that we create subscription lists
for these tinderbox messages so that those interested could see them, and
those not interested would not need to filter them out.
Is anyone else interested in doing it that way? Or is this a solution
looking for a problem?
Thus spake Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I made the suggestion in another forum that we create subscription lists
for these tinderbox messages so that those interested could see them, and
those not interested would not need to filter them out.
Is anyone else interested in doing it that way?
David Schultz wrote:
Thus spake Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I made the suggestion in another forum that we create subscription lists
for these tinderbox messages so that those interested could see them, and
those not interested would not need to filter them out.
Is anyone else interested in
Apparently, On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 11:25:12PM +,
Mike Barcroft said words to the effect of;
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
Jake Burkholder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Apparently, On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 11:25:12PM +,
Mike Barcroft said words to the effect of;
--
Kernel build for GENERIC started on Wed Jan 8 22:16:49 GMT 2003
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 03:21:22AM +, Mike Barcroft wrote:
=== sbin/swapon
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/tinderbox/sparc64/src/sbin/swapon/swapon.c: In function `swaplist':
/tinderbox/sparc64/src/sbin/swapon/swapon.c:246: warning: field width is not type
int (arg 3)
Can someone
Thus spake Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 03:21:22AM +, Mike Barcroft wrote:
=== sbin/swapon
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/tinderbox/sparc64/src/sbin/swapon/swapon.c: In function `swaplist':
/tinderbox/sparc64/src/sbin/swapon/swapon.c:246: warning:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 09:17:05PM -0800, David Schultz wrote:
Thus spake Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 03:21:22AM +, Mike Barcroft wrote:
=== sbin/swapon
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/tinderbox/sparc64/src/sbin/swapon/swapon.c: In function
* De: Craig Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-12-29 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure ]
I'm not sure if your patch will solve the problem.
The offending code is here:
240 if (lflag) {
241 char buf[32];
242 snprintf
Thus spake Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* De: Craig Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-12-29 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure ]
I'm not sure if your patch will solve the problem.
The offending code is here:
240 if (lflag) {
241
Thus spake David Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Right. The complaint is that hlen is 64 bits and the printf()
expects the field length specifier to be an int. The same goes
for getbsize(hlen, ...), so I'm not sure why the compiler didn't
complain about a type mismatch. I guess it just coerced
Apparently, On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 03:26:36AM +,
Mike Barcroft said words to the effect of;
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 04:17:34PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On 29-Nov-2002 Mike Barcroft wrote:
Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 03:22:29AM +, Mike Barcroft wrote:
Fri Nov 29 03:15:00 GMT 2002
U lib/libpam/modules/pam_ksu/pam_ksu.c
U
On 29-Nov-2002 Mike Barcroft wrote:
Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 03:22:29AM +, Mike Barcroft wrote:
Fri Nov 29 03:15:00 GMT 2002
U lib/libpam/modules/pam_ksu/pam_ksu.c
U release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/early-adopter/article.sgml
Running test variables
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 03:22:29AM +, Mike Barcroft wrote:
Fri Nov 29 03:15:00 GMT 2002
U lib/libpam/modules/pam_ksu/pam_ksu.c
U release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/early-adopter/article.sgml
Running test variables
PASS: Test variables detected no regression, output matches.
Running test targets
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 09:20:41AM +, Mike Barcroft wrote:
Thu Nov 21 09:15:00 GMT 2002
...
U sys/kern/kern_thread.c
U sys/kern/sched_4bsd.c
U sys/modules/netgraph/bluetooth/bluetooth/Makefile
U sys/modules/netgraph/bluetooth/bt3c/Makefile
U sys/modules/netgraph/bluetooth/h4/Makefile
U
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote:
--
Kernel build for GENERIC started on Sun Nov 17 20:01:33 GMT 2002
--
=== ipfilter
Apparently, On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:23:20PM -0800,
Julian Elischer said words to the effect of;
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote:
--
Kernel build for GENERIC started on Sun Nov 17 20:01:33 GMT 2002
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 03:46:55PM -0500, Jake Burkholder wrote:
Apparently, On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:23:20PM -0800,
Julian Elischer said words to the effect of;
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote:
--
Kernel build
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:
Apparently, On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:23:20PM -0800,
Julian Elischer said words to the effect of;
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote:
--
Kernel build for
Mike Barcroft wrote:
--
Kernel build for GENERIC started on Fri Nov 15 14:04:21 GMT 2002
--
=== ipfilter
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:39:15PM -0400, Jake Burkholder wrote:
You can also get various new machines on sun.com for around $1000 USD,
IIRC a 500mhz blade 100 does a buildworld in around 2-3 hours.
A $1000 (new) 500 MHz blade running GENERIC (minus WITNESS) builds world
in a little under 3
David O'Brien writes:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:39:15PM -0400, Jake Burkholder wrote:
You can also get various new machines on sun.com for around $1000 USD,
IIRC a 500mhz blade 100 does a buildworld in around 2-3 hours.
A $1000 (new) 500 MHz blade running GENERIC (minus WITNESS)
Apparently, On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:55:03AM -0500,
Andrew Gallatin said words to the effect of;
David O'Brien writes:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:39:15PM -0400, Jake Burkholder wrote:
You can also get various new machines on sun.com for around $1000 USD,
IIRC a 500mhz
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Mike Barcroft writes:
stage 4: building everything..
--
=== usr.sbin/pkg_install/info
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
Mike Barcroft writes:
stage 4: building everything..
--
=== usr.sbin/pkg_install/info
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/tinderbox/sparc64/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/info/show.c: In function `show_size':
Apparently, On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:19:09PM -0400,
Andrew Gallatin said words to the effect of;
Mike Barcroft writes:
stage 4: building everything..
--
=== usr.sbin/pkg_install/info
cc1: warnings being treated
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:39:15PM -0400, Jake Burkholder wrote:
You can get a dual 300mhz ultra 60 on ebay for $900-1000 USD. Mine
does a make -j 8 buildworld in just over 2 hours with some strategic
stuff turned off in make.conf (profiled libs, objective c, fortran).
I got my ultra 30 on
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Barcroft writes:
=== lib/libdisk
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/tinderbox/sparc64/src/lib/libdisk/disk.c:428: warning: `assignToPartition' defined
but not used
I'm actively working on this stuff, but will be at customer sites today
so if this gets in
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:25:29PM +, Mike Barcroft wrote:
--
=== gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libbfd
In file included from /tinderbox/sparc64/src/contrib/binutils/bfd/elf32.c:22:
...
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 19:51:59 GMT
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=== gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus
method.o: In function `use_thunk':
method.o(.text+0x90c): undefined reference to `sparc_output_mi_thunk'
Is this gcc 3.1 trying to build 3.2 or gcc 3.2 trying to build itself?
Buildworld
Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 19:51:59 GMT
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=== gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus
method.o: In function `use_thunk':
method.o(.text+0x90c): undefined reference to `sparc_output_mi_thunk'
Is this gcc 3.1 trying to build
The complete transcript is available here:
http://sparc64.style9.org/sparc64.log
Which still does not answer my question. What GCC version is on this
machine?
--
Alexander Kabaev
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The complete transcript is available here:
http://sparc64.style9.org/sparc64.log
Which still does not answer my question. What GCC version is on this
machine?
Sorry, I thought your question was whether it was in the cross
building stage or
Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 19:51:59 GMT
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=== gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus
method.o: In function `use_thunk':
method.o(.text+0x90c): undefined reference to `sparc_output_mi_thunk'
Is this gcc 3.1 trying to build 3.2 or gcc 3.2
Apparently, On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:21:12PM -0700,
Peter Wemm said words to the effect of;
Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 19:51:59 GMT
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=== gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus
method.o: In function `use_thunk':
Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 19:51:59 GMT
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=== gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus
method.o: In function `use_thunk':
method.o(.text+0x90c): undefined reference to `sparc_output_mi_thunk'
Is
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
--
stage 4: building everything..
--
=== sbin/fsck_ffs
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
Mike Barcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks. Do you want to increase the tinderbox to run twice a day?
Sure, done.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike Barcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DES, there wasn't enough context on this to solve the problem.
I don't really see what more you need. What's missing?
The first line and cause of the subsequent errors:
In file included from
Mike Barcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike Barcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DES, there wasn't enough context on this to solve the problem.
I don't really see what more you need. What's missing?
The first line and cause of the subsequent
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ah, looks like a bug in whereintheworld. It's not supposed to
truncate error messages.
I've hacked whereintheworld to print everything since the last '==='
in case of an error, rather than just the last ten lines. If anyone
is interested it's in
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ah, looks like a bug in whereintheworld. It's not supposed to
truncate error messages.
I've hacked whereintheworld to print everything since the last '==='
in case of an error, rather than just
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--
Kernel build for GENERIC started on Sat Jul 27 11:45:42 GMT 2002
--
=== GENERIC
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--
stage 4: building everything..
--
=== usr.sbin/mrouted/testrsrr
=== usr.sbin/mtest
=== usr.sbin/mtree
=== usr.sbin/ndp
John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does tinderbox run with a nonstandard WARNS setting? I did the
cross build with these environment settings:
des@freefall ~% cat tinderbox/make.conf
CFLAGS = -O -pipe
COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe
NOPROFILE= true
MAKE_KERBEROS4 = yes
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does tinderbox run with a nonstandard WARNS setting? I did the
cross build with these environment settings:
des@freefall ~% cat tinderbox/make.conf
CFLAGS = -O
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--
Kernel build for GENERIC started on Wed Jul 24 11:45:59 GMT 2002
--
=== GENERIC
FYI: static unit limits for ppp are set:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mike Barcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--
Kernel build for GENERIC started on Wed Jul 24 11:45:59 GMT 2002
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 05:54, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
=== sbin/newfs
/usr/home/des/tinderbox/sparc64/src/sbin/newfs/mkfs.c: In function `fsinit':
/usr/home/des/tinderbox/sparc64/src/sbin/newfs/mkfs.c:711: structure has no member
named `di_createtime'
*** Error code 1
Stop in
On (2002/07/17 06:49), Rob Hughes wrote:
=== sbin/newfs
/usr/home/des/tinderbox/sparc64/src/sbin/newfs/mkfs.c: In function `fsinit':
/usr/home/des/tinderbox/sparc64/src/sbin/newfs/mkfs.c:711: structure has no member
named `di_createtime'
*** Error code 1
Stop in
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--
stage 4: building everything..
--
=== gnu/lib/libobjc
=== gnu/lib/libg2c
=== gnu/usr.bin
=== gnu/usr.bin/bc
===
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Whoever fixes this, and however we agree to fix it,
should also remember to close the bin/40382 PR.
Comments on the attached, untested patch?
Disable fatal warnings during bootstrap, build, and cross
Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote:
Comments on the attached, untested patch?
Disable fatal warnings during bootstrap, build, and cross tools
phase of world.
The setting of NO_WERROR belongs in [BTX]MAKE if anywhere. This is
already done
On 2002-07-10 09:58 +, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
=== bin/chmod
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/usr/home/des/tinderbox/sparc64/src/bin/chmod/chmod.c: In function `main':
/usr/home/des/tinderbox/sparc64/src/bin/chmod/chmod.c:174: warning: null format
string
How does this look for
Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How does this look for fixing this warning?
No, gcc should accept a NULL format string for err(3). It looks like
__printf0like is broken.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2002-07-10 09:58 +, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
=== bin/chmod
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/usr/home/des/tinderbox/sparc64/src/bin/chmod/chmod.c: In function `main':
/usr/home/des/tinderbox/sparc64/src/bin/chmod/chmod.c:174:
On 2002-07-10 14:22 +, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: How does this look for fixing this warning?
:
:No, gcc should accept a NULL format string for err(3). It looks like
:__printf0like is broken.
Oops. I've already starting changing the calls
:
:Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: How does this look for fixing this warning?
:
:No, gcc should accept a NULL format string for err(3). It looks like
:__printf0like is broken.
:
:DES
:--
:Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oops. I've already starting changing the
Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The main bug is that the warning is emitted. err(1, NULL) is perfectly
valid (see err(4)). Apparently the sparc64 compiler is missing support
for __printf0like.
Strangely, my Alpha (July 3 -CURRENT) complains about this too, but my
i386 (June 24
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
The extra verboseness is fine, and I was almost finished posting a
note that mentioned it. But I didn't thinking that the __printf0like
bugs will never be fixed if we hide them by patching chmod.
It was fixed more than a month ago:
% RCS file:
On Wednesday, July 10, 2002, at 05:22 PM, Matthew Dillon wrote:
[snips]
Personally speaking, as much as GCC annoys me it is sometimes
better to
modify the utility code then to add yet another hack to GCC that
needs
to be synchronized every time we update.
Matthew Dillon wrote:
:
:Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: How does this look for fixing this warning?
:
:No, gcc should accept a NULL format string for err(3). It looks like
:__printf0like is broken.
:
:DES
:--
:Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oops. I've
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The main bug is that the warning is emitted. err(1, NULL) is perfectly
valid (see err(4)). Apparently the sparc64 compiler is missing support
for __printf0like.
Strangely, my Alpha (July 3 -CURRENT) complains about this
Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
peter@panther[4:22pm]~-106 cc -O -Wformat -c foo.c
peter@panther[4:22pm]~-107
ie: it looks like it is completely disabled. Maybe the sparc64 tinderbox
host is simply out of sync with -current?
It has a kernel/world of June 27, which seems to be
Thus spake Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Please do not. gcc is just a tool. If it emits a warning on some arches
because gcc doesn't understand how our libraries work, then we should
disable the gcc checking for those arches on those functions. ie: remove
the __printf0like completely for
Whoever fixes this, and however we agree to fix it,
should also remember to close the bin/40382 PR.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Whoever fixes this, and however we agree to fix it,
should also remember to close the bin/40382 PR.
Comments on the attached, untested patch?
Best regards,
Mike Barcroft
Disable fatal warnings during bootstrap, build, and cross tools
phase of
Bruce,
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 08:23:06AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
The extra verboseness is fine, and I was almost finished posting a
note that mentioned it. But I didn't thinking that the __printf0like
bugs will never be fixed if we hide them by patching chmod.
It was fixed more than a
Would it be possible to get better granularity on when things like this
are sent to the list? Maybe some flag to set that says, Hey, I started an
actual buildworld, so from here on out any errors get mailed to the list.
Doug
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Mon Jul 8 07:00:00
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thu Jun 13 07:00:00 GMT 2002
cvs [update aborted]: /home/ncvs/CVSROOT: Permission denied
Mike, looks like the /work/repo isn't mounted on bowie. Can you fix
this before the next run (7 am GMT tomorrow)?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL
81 matches
Mail list logo
