On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 09:03:38AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Am 2024-03-10 22:57, schrieb Konstantin Belousov:
>
> > We are already low on the free bits in the flags, even after expanding
> > them
> > to 64bit. More, there are useful common fs services continuously
> > consuming
> >
Am 2024-03-10 22:57, schrieb Konstantin Belousov:
We are already low on the free bits in the flags, even after expanding
them
to 64bit. More, there are useful common fs services continuously
consuming
that flags, e.g. the recent NFS TLS options.
I object against using the flags for
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 09:50:51PM +, Kirk McKusick wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 19:21:54 +0200
> > From: Konstantin Belousov
> > To: Kirk McKusick
> > Cc: curr...@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Re: Reason why "nocache" option is not displayed in &quo
> Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 19:21:54 +0200
> From: Konstantin Belousov
> To: Kirk McKusick
> Cc: curr...@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Reason why "nocache" option is not displayed in "mount"?
>
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 01:53:05AM +, Kirk McKusick wro
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 01:53:05AM +, Kirk McKusick wrote:
> The issue has to do with how flags are defined in mount.h.
> Specifically there are the flags that are externally visible
> (prefixed with MNT_) and those that are for internal use
> (prefixed with MNTK_, the K standing for KERNEL).
Kirk McKusick wrote on
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 01:53:05 UTC :
> The issue has to do with how flags are defined in mount.h.
> Specifically there are the flags that are externally visible
> (prefixed with MNT_) and those that are for internal use
> (prefixed with MNTK_, the K standing for KERNEL).
The issue has to do with how flags are defined in mount.h.
Specifically there are the flags that are externally visible
(prefixed with MNT_) and those that are for internal use
(prefixed with MNTK_, the K standing for KERNEL). If it
is desirable to have MNTK_NULL_NOCACHE visible, then it
should be
Am 2024-03-09 15:27, schrieb Rick Macklem:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 5:08 AM Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
Am 2024-03-09 06:07, schrieb Warner Losh:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 1:05 PM Jamie Landeg-Jones
> wrote:
>
>> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> what is the reason why "nocache" is
On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 5:08 AM Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
>
> Am 2024-03-09 06:07, schrieb Warner Losh:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 1:05 PM Jamie Landeg-Jones
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> what is the reason why "nocache" is not displayed in the
Am 2024-03-09 06:07, schrieb Warner Losh:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 1:05 PM Jamie Landeg-Jones
wrote:
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
what is the reason why "nocache" is not displayed in the output of
"mount" for nullfs options?
Good catch. I also notice that "hidden" is not shown either.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 1:05 PM Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > what is the reason why "nocache" is not displayed in the output of
> > "mount" for nullfs options?
>
> Good catch. I also notice that "hidden" is not shown either.
>
> I guess that as for
Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
> Good catch. I also notice that "hidden" is not shown either.
Sorry, I meant mount option "ignore" not "hidden".
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what is the reason why "nocache" is not displayed in the output of
> "mount" for nullfs options?
Good catch. I also notice that "hidden" is not shown either.
I guess that as for some time, "nocache" was a "secret" option, no-one
update "mount" to display
Am 2024-03-07 14:59, schrieb Christos Chatzaras:
what is the reason why "nocache" is not displayed in the output of
"mount" for nullfs options?
# grep packages /etc/fstab.commit_leidinger_net
/shared/ports/packages
/space/jails/commit.leidinger.net/shared/ports/packages
> what is the reason why "nocache" is not displayed in the output of "mount"
> for nullfs options?
>
> # grep packages /etc/fstab.commit_leidinger_net
> /shared/ports/packages
> /space/jails/commit.leidinger.net/shared/ports/packages nullfs
> rw,noatime,nocache 0 0
>
Hi,
what is the reason why "nocache" is not displayed in the output of
"mount" for nullfs options?
# grep packages /etc/fstab.commit_leidinger_net
/shared/ports/packages
/space/jails/commit.leidinger.net/shared/ports/packages nullfs
rw,noatime,nocache 0 0
# mount |
16 matches
Mail list logo
