Garrett,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> If someone would please, PLEASE commit this.. I will give you beer, or
> >> wine, or a copy of Skyrim, or a few months subscription to WoW, or
> >> something else of value to you that we could negotiate :)... I'm quite
> >> fran
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Max Khon wrote:
> Garrett,
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
>>
>> I've attached a patch that makes make do what I would like it to do;
>> there are some other items that require cleanup to achieve the `argv0'
>> prefixing that's availabl
Garrett,
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> I've attached a patch that makes make do what I would like it to do;
> there are some other items that require cleanup to achieve the `argv0'
> prefixing that's available in gmake, but this is good enough for a
> meaningful traceb
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 6:08 PM, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:04:08AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>> I think this is useful, perhaps send it to harti@ or jilles@ for review?
>
> I'd like to get some NetBSD bmake maintainers POV too.
> We should reduce the needless diversion betw
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:04:08AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> I think this is useful, perhaps send it to harti@ or jilles@ for review?
I'd like to get some NetBSD bmake maintainers POV too.
We should reduce the needless diversion between the two makes.
--
-- David (obr...@freebsd.org)
___
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 05:59:33PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Wed Nov 30 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Alexander Best
> >> wrote:
> >> ? ? pmake sucks as far as diagnostic output is concerned when
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> So, now that you've improved the default diagnostic output of make, how
> about the OP's original request:
> make -s truly silent by removing unnecessary diagnostic messages when -s
> is used? :)
>
> [Thought I'd bring the thread back aroun
Garrett,
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> What I really want is this:
> >
> > $ cat Makefile
> > all: foo bar baz yadda
> >
> > foo bar yadda:
> >
> > baz:
> >false
> > $ gmake
> > false
> > gmake: *** [baz] Error 1
> >
> > $ make all
> > false
> >
So, now that you've improved the default diagnostic output of make, how
about the OP's original request:
make -s truly silent by removing unnecessary diagnostic messages when -s
is used? :)
[Thought I'd bring the thread back around to it's original purpose.]
--
Freddie Cash
fjwc...@gmail.com
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 2:15:11 am Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Alexander Best
wrote:
> >> On Wed Nov 30 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Alexander Best
wrote:
> >>> >
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
>> On Wed Nov 30 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
>>> > On Tue Nov 29 11, Warner Losh wrote:
>>> >> kill it.
>>> >>
>>> >> Warner
>>
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Wed Nov 30 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
>> > On Tue Nov 29 11, Warner Losh wrote:
>> >> kill it.
>> >>
>> >> Warner
>> >> On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:07 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
On Wed Nov 30 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Tue Nov 29 11, Warner Losh wrote:
> >> kill it.
> >>
> >> Warner
> >> On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:07 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>
> >> > Any objections to this? It removes a weird line during 'make -
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Tue Nov 29 11, Warner Losh wrote:
>> kill it.
>>
>> Warner
>> On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:07 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> > Any objections to this? It removes a weird line during 'make -s
>> > buildworld'
>> > output and I think it was debug
On Tue Nov 29 11, Warner Losh wrote:
> kill it.
>
> Warner
> On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:07 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > Any objections to this? It removes a weird line during 'make -s
> > buildworld'
> > output and I think it was debugging accidentally left in in 213077 by
> > Warner:
> >
> > In
kill it.
Warner
On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:07 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> Any objections to this? It removes a weird line during 'make -s buildworld'
> output and I think it was debugging accidentally left in in 213077 by Warner:
>
> Index: newvers.sh
> ===
On 11/29/2011 13:07, John Baldwin wrote:
> Any objections to this?
Nope. I wondered why it was there myself, but didn't care enough to ask. :)
> It removes a weird line during 'make -s buildworld'
> output and I think it was debugging accidentally left in in 213077 by Warner:
>
> Index: newvers
Any objections to this? It removes a weird line during 'make -s buildworld'
output and I think it was debugging accidentally left in in 213077 by Warner:
Index: newvers.sh
===
--- newvers.sh (revision 228074)
+++ newvers.sh (worki
18 matches
Mail list logo
