Re: SED regression

2002-12-05 Thread Tim Robbins
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:49:01PM +0900, FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote: > Does anyone see this? > both -CURRENT and -STABLE fail at the same place. > > note: GNU sed 3.02 from ports passed this test. > > /usr/src/tools/regression/usr.bin/sed$ make > Running test G > PASS: Test G detected no regressio

Re: SED regression

2002-12-05 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-12-05 ] [ Subjecte: Re: SED regression ] > But I'm pretty confident that what we do now is correct, and it seems to > be in agreement with POSIX.1-2001, which says: Feel free to regenerate regress.y.out or whatno

Re: SED regression

2002-12-05 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:49:01PM +0900, FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote: > Does anyone see this? > both -CURRENT and -STABLE fail at the same place. > > note: GNU sed 3.02 from ports passed this test. > > /usr/src/tools/regression/usr.bin/sed$ make > Running test G > PASS: Test G detected no regression

SED regression

2002-12-05 Thread FUJISHIMA Satsuki
Does anyone see this? both -CURRENT and -STABLE fail at the same place. note: GNU sed 3.02 from ports passed this test. /usr/src/tools/regression/usr.bin/sed$ make Running test G PASS: Test G detected no regression. (in /usr/src/tools/regression/usr.bin/sed) Running test P PASS: Test P detected n