Re: Samsung SSD TRIM [Was: Heads up]

2016-04-15 Thread Andriy Gapon
On 15/04/2016 14:20, Steven Hartland wrote: > Prior to Warners commit there was no NCQ TRIM support in FreeBSD, so while it > was working with standard non-NCQ TRIM (and I can corroborate that as we use > the > 840's and 850's all over with ZFS with TRIM enabled) its possible that it > could > ca

Re: Samsung SSD TRIM [Was: Heads up]

2016-04-15 Thread Warner Losh
> On Apr 15, 2016, at 7:14 AM, Tommi Pernila wrote: > > Hi, > > On Friday, 15 April 2016, Steven Hartland wrote: > >> On 15/04/2016 09:11, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> avg wrote: >>> For what it's worth, I have been using the following SSDs since September of 2015 :

Re: Samsung SSD TRIM [Was: Heads up]

2016-04-15 Thread Tommi Pernila
Hi, On Friday, 15 April 2016, Steven Hartland wrote: > On 15/04/2016 09:11, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> avg wrote: >> >>> For what it's worth, I have been using the following SSDs since >>> September of 2015 : >>> >>> ada2: ACS-2 ATA SATA 3.x device >>> ada3: ACS-2 ATA SATA 3.x device >>

Re: Samsung SSD TRIM [Was: Heads up]

2016-04-15 Thread Steven Hartland
On 15/04/2016 09:11, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! avg wrote: For what it's worth, I have been using the following SSDs since September of 2015 : ada2: ACS-2 ATA SATA 3.x device ada3: ACS-2 ATA SATA 3.x device I have one in use with zfs and trim: ada1: ACS-2 ATA SATA 3.x device Works as my por

Re: Samsung SSD TRIM [Was: Heads up]

2016-04-15 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! avg wrote: > For what it's worth, I have been using the following SSDs since September of > 2015 : > > ada2: ACS-2 ATA SATA 3.x device > ada3: ACS-2 ATA SATA 3.x device I have one in use with zfs and trim: ada1: ACS-2 ATA SATA 3.x device Works as my ports build hosts, and is fine as fa

Samsung SSD TRIM [Was: Heads up]

2016-04-15 Thread Andriy Gapon
On 15/04/2016 07:19, Warner Losh wrote: > Samsung 830 all firmware > Samsung 840 all firmware > Samsung 850 all firmware > > All of these are at least 18 months old (if not older). There's some > confusing in Linux lists on > the full impact of the Samsung drives (there was a bug in the Linux > im