Screen saver: bsd_saver.

2003-06-26 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
Hello there. I've wrote screen saver for FreeBSD 5.x with rotating "bsd" logo. http://garage.freebsd.pl/bsd_saver.tbz Any chance to add it to tree? Thanks. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek [EMAIL PROTECTED] UNIX Systems Programmer/Administrator http://garage.freebsd.pl

Re: Screen saver: bsd_saver.

2003-06-26 Thread Andrew Kenneth Milton
+---[ Pawel Jakub Dawidek ]-- | Hello there. | | I've wrote screen saver for FreeBSD 5.x with rotating "bsd" logo. | | http://garage.freebsd.pl/bsd_saver.tbz | | Any chance to add it to tree? It'd be nice if it automatically reverted to low-res mode if it can't obt

Re: Screen saver: bsd_saver.

2003-06-26 Thread User Takawata
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote : >Hello there. > >I've wrote screen saver for FreeBSD 5.x with rotating "bsd" logo. > > http://garage.freebsd.pl/bsd_saver.tbz > >Any chance to add it to tree? I don't know whether it works or not, but this contains floating point i

Re: Screen saver: bsd_saver.

2003-06-27 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 10:58:33AM +0900, User Takawata wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote > : > >Hello there. > > > >I've wrote screen saver for FreeBSD 5.x with rotating "bsd" logo. > > > > http://garage.freebsd.pl/bsd_saver.tbz > > > >Any chance to add it to

Re: Screen saver: bsd_saver.

2003-06-27 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 09:20:03AM +, Bosko Milekic wrote: +> > >Hello there. +> > > +> > >I've wrote screen saver for FreeBSD 5.x with rotating "bsd" logo. +> > > +> > > http://garage.freebsd.pl/bsd_saver.tbz +> > > +> > >Any chance to add it to tree? +> > +> > I don't know whether it works

Re: Screen saver: bsd_saver.

2003-06-27 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 03:35:19PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: +> +> FWIW, I've tested this yesterday and wanted to commit it but +> +> shamefully I must admit that I don't know how to properly prepare a +> +> port. The screen saver works and is pretty neat although I had to +> +> bu