On 2017-Apr-20, at 2:31 AM, Tom Vijlbrief wrote:
>> Op wo 19 apr. 2017 09:11 schreef Tom Vijlbrief :
>> I'm currently rebuilding world and kernel on a just completed SVN checkout.
>>
>> Note that the normal sendmail daemon which listens for incoming traffic does
>> NOT loop.
>>
>> The sendmail
's context.
>>
>> There is also the possibility that Tom V.'s report is a fully independent
>> issue. But such does not seem all that likely on the initial information.
>>
>>
>> > On 2017-Apr-17, at 7:57 AM, Mark Millard
>> wrote:
>&
endent
> issue. But such does not seem all that likely on the initial information.
>
>
> > On 2017-Apr-17, at 7:57 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
> >
> >> Just an FYI of a more recent report of runaway sendmail on a
> >> more recent system version ( -r317039 ):
> &
sion ( -r317039 ):
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> From: Tom Vijlbrief
>>> Subject: Sendmail eats CPU on r317039
>>> Date: April 17, 2017 at 3:39:37 AM PDT
>>> To: "freebsd-current at freebsd.org" ,
>>> freebsd-arm
>
takes >10
minutes!'
Regards,
Ronald.
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 16:57:39 +0200, Mark Millard
wrote:
Just an FYI of a more recent report of runaway sendmail on a
more recent system version ( -r317039 ):
Begin forwarded message:
From: Tom Vijlbrief
Subject: Sendmail eats CPU on r31703
Just an FYI of a more recent report of runaway sendmail on a
more recent system version ( -r317039 ):
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Tom Vijlbrief
> Subject: Sendmail eats CPU on r317039
> Date: April 17, 2017 at 3:39:37 AM PDT
> To: "freebsd-current at freebsd.org" ,
On a recent kernel sendmail is constantly consuming CPU.
truss -p PID
shows:
sendto(3,"<22>Apr 17 10:30:33 sendmail[362"...,163,0x0,NULL,0) ERR#55 'No
buffer space available'
nanosleep({ 0.01000 }) = 0 (0x0)
sendto(3,"<22>Apr 17 10:30:33 sendmail[362"...,163,0x0,NULL,0) ERR#55 'No
buffer spa
