On 16-Mar-2003 FUJITA Kazutoshi wrote:
>> Could I have you both try this patch and mail me the entire output og
>> dmesg with it applied ? (patch against a clean -current)
>
> ata-chipset.c can't be compiled which applied your patch ;-)
>
>
>> Index: ata-chipset.c
>
>> @@ -1576,6 +1577,7 @@
>>
From: Soeren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SiS5591(?) ATA
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:50:30 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Could I have you both try this patch and mail me the entire output og
> dmesg with it applied ? (patch against a clean -current)
a
It seems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 15-Mar-2003 Soeren Schmidt wrote:
> >> atapci0: port 0xff00-0xff0f at device 2.5 on
> >> pci0
> >> ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0
> >> ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0
> >> ad0: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device
> >> ad0: 78533MB [159560/16/
From: Soeren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SiS5591(?) ATA
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 21:14:16 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hmm, the cable detection sems to be failing somehow...
>
> Now is the chip found correctly ? is it *really* a SiS 961 (old ATA1
On 15-Mar-2003 Soeren Schmidt wrote:
>> atapci0: port 0xff00-0xff0f at device 2.5 on
>> pci0
>> ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0
>> ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0
>> ad0: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device
>> ad0: 78533MB [159560/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33
>> ad1: DMA limited t
It seems FUJITA Kazutoshi wrote:
> become better.
> but still it does't work in UDMA100.
>
>
> atapci0: port 0xff00-0xff0f at device 2.5 on pci0
> ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0
> ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0
> ad0: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device
> ad0: 78533MB [159560/1
From: Soeren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SiS5591(?) ATA
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 20:06:33 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hmm, OK, try this patch:
become better.
but still it does't work in UDMA100.
atapci0: port 0xff00-0xff0f at device 2.5 on pci
It seems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On 15-Mar-2003 Soeren Schmidt wrote:
> > Please make sure that ata-chipset.c is rev 1.14 which corrected a
> > bug in the chip ident function...
>
> ata-chipset.c 1.14 was checked in on March 12 my kernel is from two days after.
> So I guess it is included.
On 15-Mar-2003 Soeren Schmidt wrote:
> Please make sure that ata-chipset.c is rev 1.14 which corrected a
> bug in the chip ident function...
ata-chipset.c 1.14 was checked in on March 12 my kernel is from two days after.
So I guess it is included. I cvsuped the same sources I used to compile my
It seems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> jmmr# dmesg | egrep '(ad0|ata|ATA)'
> pci0: at device 2.5 (no driver attached)
> ata0 at port 0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 irq 14 on isa0
> ata1 at port 0x376,0x170-0x177 irq 15 on isa0
> ad0: 38166MB [77545/16/63] at ata0-master PIO4
> acd0: CDROM at ata1-master PIO4
Hello,
I have exactly the same problem with my system (FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #8: Thu Mar
13 15:56:51 CET 2003). My board is a K7S6A with SiS745 North- and Southbridge.
pciconf -lv tells me that my IDE Controller is the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:5: class=0x010180 card=0x0a411019 chip=0x5513103
Hi,
I've upgraded to -CURRENT from -STABLE yesterday.
But something strange with ATA.
It can't be used in UDMA100 mode.
In boot message,
...
pci0: at device 2.5 (no driver attached)
...
ad0: 78533MB [159560/16/63] at ata0-master PIO4
ad1: 39266MB [79780/16/63] at ata0-slave PIO4
acd0: DVD-R
12 matches
Mail list logo
