Re: Special fx with disklabel(8)?

2002-05-13 Thread Terry Lambert
Ian wrote: > > From: Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [misinformation from Terry and lots of flamage snipped] > > > > Gentlemen.. does this discussion on a public list serve any useful purpose? > > Of course it does ... it's training newcomers to the list and people who > peruse the list a

Re: Special fx with disklabel(8)?

2002-05-13 Thread Ian
> From: Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [misinformation from Terry and lots of flamage snipped] > > Gentlemen.. does this discussion on a public list serve any useful purpose? Of course it does ... it's training newcomers to the list and people who peruse the list archives in the future

Re: Special fx with disklabel(8)?

2002-05-12 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 10:19:45PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > >> Please do not follow Terrys advice, unless and until you have > > >> independent confirmation that his 10 year old knowledge is still > > >> current. > > > > > >Poul: "I will say that advice is bad, bu

Re: Special fx with disklabel(8)?

2002-05-12 Thread Terry Lambert
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> Please do not follow Terrys advice, unless and until you have > >> independent confirmation that his 10 year old knowledge is still > >> current. > > > >Poul: "I will say that advice is bad, but I will not provide advice > > of my own, because it might be bad, t

Re: Special fx with disklabel(8)?

2002-05-12 Thread Szilveszter Adam
Hello everybody, OK, just in order to clarify before things get out of hand.:-) There is no immediate problem, the drive in question has been installed and works fine. (using it this instant). As for the BIOS part, the mobo could probably use an upgrade, because the BIOS is still from spring of

Re: Special fx with disklabel(8)?

2002-05-12 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Terry Lambert writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> Please do not follow Terrys advice, unless and until you have >> independent confirmation that his 10 year old knowledge is still >> current. > >Poul: "I will say that advice is bad, but I will not provide advice >

Re: Special fx with disklabel(8)?

2002-05-12 Thread Terry Lambert
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Please do not follow Terrys advice, unless and until you have > independent confirmation that his 10 year old knowledge is still > current. Poul: "I will say that advice is bad, but I will not provide advice of my own, because it might be bad, too, and open me to

Re: Special fx with disklabel(8)?

2002-05-12 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Terry Lambert writes: >DOS partition tables use a 24b C/H/S value. With 512B sectors, this >means they are incapable of representing more than 8G of disk space. Ahh, I love these time-warp emails from Terry. [*] This is the way the world looked circa 1990. I d

Re: Special fx with disklabel(8)?

2002-05-12 Thread Terry Lambert
DOS partition tables use a 24b C/H/S value. With 512B sectors, this means they are incapable of representing more than 8G of disk space. To support a 32b sector offset, you have to go to LBA mode. This isn't really supported by any BIOS that still respects the C/H/S offsets, since they will ove

Special fx with disklabel(8)?

2002-05-12 Thread Szilveszter Adam
Hello, I have a -CURRENT from May 5th. I recently bought a new 40 gig IDE disk and proceeded to install it. I went for "compatible" (as opposed to "dangerously dedicated") mode. I first used fdisk to initialize the slice table and create a FreeBSD slice that would take in the whole disk. After