Re: Survey results very helpful, thanks! (was: Re: net.inet.tcp.timer_race: does anyone have a non-zero value?)

2010-03-09 Thread Doug Hardie
On 8 March 2010, at 12:33, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Doug Hardie wrote: > >> I run a number of 4 core systems with em interfaces. These are production >> systems that are unmanned and located a long way from me. Under unusual >> conditions it can take up to 6 hours to get

Re: Survey results very helpful, thanks! (was: Re: net.inet.tcp.timer_race: does anyone have a non-zero value?)

2010-03-08 Thread Robert Watson
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Doug Hardie wrote: I run a number of 4 core systems with em interfaces. These are production systems that are unmanned and located a long way from me. Under unusual conditions it can take up to 6 hours to get there. I have been waiting to switch to 8.0 because of the di

Re: Survey results very helpful, thanks! (was: Re: net.inet.tcp.timer_race: does anyone have a non-zero value?)

2010-03-08 Thread Doug Hardie
On 8 March 2010, at 06:53, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Mar 2010, Robert Watson wrote: > >> If your system shows a non-zero value, please send me a *private e-mail* >> with the output of that command, plus also the output of "sysctl kern.smp", >> "uptime", and a brief description of the

Survey results very helpful, thanks! (was: Re: net.inet.tcp.timer_race: does anyone have a non-zero value?)

2010-03-08 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010, Robert Watson wrote: If your system shows a non-zero value, please send me a *private e-mail* with the output of that command, plus also the output of "sysctl kern.smp", "uptime", and a brief description of the workload and network interface configuration. For example: it