Macklem
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 12:28:05 PM
To: Emmanuel Vadot
Cc: Konstantin Belousov; FreeBSD Current; freebsd...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Switch vfs.nfsd.issue_delegations to TUNABLE ?
Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
[stuff snipped]
> I haven't test by I can say that it will work, I
Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
[stuff snipped]
> I haven't test by I can say that it will work, I actually wondered at
>first doing that. The problem with this patch is what I tried to
>describe in my first and following mails, since you can turn on and off
>delegation you can still have delegation (so nfsr
t; Cc: Konstantin Belousov; FreeBSD Current; freebsd...@freebsd.org; Rick Macklem
> Subject: Re: Switch vfs.nfsd.issue_delegations to TUNABLE ?
>
> I think the attached patch should fix your performance problem.
> It simply checks for nfsrv_delegatecnt != 0 before doing all the
> locki
: Emmanuel Vadot
Cc: Konstantin Belousov; FreeBSD Current; freebsd...@freebsd.org; Rick Macklem
Subject: Re: Switch vfs.nfsd.issue_delegations to TUNABLE ?
Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
>I wrote:
>> Since it defaults to "disabled", I don't see why a tunable would be
>> necess
ousov; FreeBSD Current; freebsd...@freebsd.org; Rick Macklem
Subject: Re: Switch vfs.nfsd.issue_delegations to TUNABLE ?
Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
>I wrote:
>> Since it defaults to "disabled", I don't see why a tunable would be
>> necessary?
>> (Just do nothing and
Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
>I wrote:
>> Since it defaults to "disabled", I don't see why a tunable would be
>> necessary?
>> (Just do nothing and delegations don't happen. If you want the server
>> to issue delegations, then use the sysctl to turn them on. If you want to
>> turn
>> them off again at
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:12:38 +
Rick Macklem wrote:
> Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:26:10PM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
> >> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 13:04:28 +0200
> >> Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:41:36AM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrot
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:40:09 +0200
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:26:10PM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 13:04:28 +0200
> > Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:41:36AM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:26:10PM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
>> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 13:04:28 +0200
>> Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:41:36AM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hello,
>> > >
>> > > I would like to switch the vf
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:26:10PM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 13:04:28 +0200
> Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:41:36AM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I would like to switch the vfs.nfsd.issue_delegations sysctl t
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 13:04:28 +0200
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:41:36AM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to switch the vfs.nfsd.issue_delegations sysctl to a
> > tunable.
> > The reason behind it is recent problem at work on some on
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:41:36AM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to switch the vfs.nfsd.issue_delegations sysctl to a
> tunable.
> The reason behind it is recent problem at work on some on our filer
> related to NFS.
> We use NFSv4 without delegation as we never bee
Hello,
I would like to switch the vfs.nfsd.issue_delegations sysctl to a
tunable.
The reason behind it is recent problem at work on some on our filer
related to NFS.
We use NFSv4 without delegation as we never been able to have good
performance with FreeBSD server and Linux client (we need to
13 matches
Mail list logo
