Re: Ver 2 of the patch [was: Re: i915 driver update testing]

2014-10-22 Thread Konstantin Belousov
In fact, try https://www.kib.kiev.ua/kib/drm/i915.5.patch ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: Ver 2 of the patch [was: Re: i915 driver update testing]

2014-10-22 Thread Adam McDougall
On 10/22/2014 08:26, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 03:12:08PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: On 10/08/2014 13:05, Konstantin Belousov wrote: There are more occurences of the bug I fixed once in patch version 2. Also, since pmap changes were committed in modified form, please

Jenkins, Kyua, and Bhyve used for FreeBSD OS testing

2014-10-20 Thread Craig Rodrigues
Hi, FYI, Kohsuke Kawaguchi, the lead developer of Jenkins, accepted my posting on the Jenkins blog, which describes how the FreeBSD project is using Jenkins, Kyua, and Bhyve for FreeBSD OS testing: http://jenkins-ci.org/content/freebsd-project-use-jenkins-os-testing -- Craig

Re: Jenkins, Kyua, and Bhyve used for FreeBSD OS testing

2014-10-20 Thread Alfred Perlstein
project is using Jenkins, Kyua, and Bhyve for FreeBSD OS testing: http://jenkins-ci.org/content/freebsd-project-use-jenkins-os-testing -- Craig ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

Re: Jenkins, Kyua, and Bhyve used for FreeBSD OS testing

2014-10-20 Thread Craig Rodrigues
Jenkins, Kyua, and Bhyve for FreeBSD OS testing: http://jenkins-ci.org/content/freebsd-project-use-jenkins-os-testing -- Craig ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current

Re: BAFUG Oct 9: Kyua and jenkins testing framework

2014-10-10 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi, On October 9, 2014, in Mountain View, California, I will be giving a brief tech tech on: Kyua and Jenkins: Testing Framework for BSD Here are more details on the tak, plus directions to the location: http

Re: Ver 2 of the patch [was: Re: i915 driver update testing]

2014-10-08 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:04:54PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: On 10/07/2014 14:01, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:44:19PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: From the same frame, please do p *(struct drm_i915_private *)(dev-private) p *(struct drm_i915_private

Re: Ver 2 of the patch [was: Re: i915 driver update testing]

2014-10-08 Thread Adam McDougall
On 10/08/2014 13:05, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:04:54PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: On 10/07/2014 14:01, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:44:19PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: From the same frame, please do p *(struct drm_i915_private

Re: Ver 2 of the patch [was: Re: i915 driver update testing]

2014-10-08 Thread Ranjan1018 .
2014-10-08 19:05 GMT+02:00 Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com: On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:04:54PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: On 10/07/2014 14:01, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:44:19PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: From the same frame, please do p

Re: i915 driver update testing

2014-10-08 Thread O. Hartmann
Am Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:54:22 +0200 Koop Mast k...@rainbow-runner.nl schrieb: On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 20:02 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Please find at the https://kib.kiev.ua/kib/drm/i915.1.patch a patch which provides some updates to the i915 driver. At large, this is import of the

Re: i915 driver update testing

2014-10-07 Thread Adam McDougall
On 10/7/2014 12:20 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 07:30:20PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: On 10/05/2014 13:00, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 11:01:14AM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: (kgdb) #0 doadump (textdump=1) at pcpu.h:219 #1

Re: i915 driver update testing

2014-10-07 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:00:56AM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: On 10/7/2014 12:20 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 07:30:20PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: On 10/05/2014 13:00, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 11:01:14AM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:

Ver 2 of the patch [was: Re: i915 driver update testing]

2014-10-07 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:44:19PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: From the same frame, please do p *(struct drm_i915_private *)(dev-private) I probably figured out what is wrong, but it is still interesting to see this piece of data. For everybody who has the issue with blank screen or

Re: i915 driver update testing

2014-10-07 Thread Adam McDougall
On 10/07/2014 12:44, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:00:56AM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: On 10/7/2014 12:20 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 07:30:20PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: On 10/05/2014 13:00, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Sun, Oct 05,

Re: i915 driver update testing

2014-10-07 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 02:08:06PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: On 10/07/2014 12:44, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:00:56AM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: On 10/7/2014 12:20 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 07:30:20PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:

Re: Ver 2 of the patch [was: Re: i915 driver update testing]

2014-10-07 Thread Ranjan1018 .
2014-10-07 20:01 GMT+02:00 Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com: On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:44:19PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: From the same frame, please do p *(struct drm_i915_private *)(dev-private) I probably figured out what is wrong, but it is still interesting to see this

Re: Ver 2 of the patch [was: Re: i915 driver update testing]

2014-10-07 Thread Ed Maste
On 7 October 2014 15:20, Ranjan1018 . 21474...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -- |diff --git a/sys/amd64/conf/X b/sys/amd64/conf/X |index 0cd80c6..2d630d5 100644 |--- a/sys/amd64/conf/X

Re: i915 driver update testing

2014-10-07 Thread Adam McDougall
On 10/07/2014 14:24, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 02:08:06PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: On 10/07/2014 12:44, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:00:56AM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: On 10/7/2014 12:20 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Mon, Oct 06,

Re: Ver 2 of the patch [was: Re: i915 driver update testing]

2014-10-07 Thread Ranjan1018 .
2014-10-07 21:29 GMT+02:00 Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org: On 7 October 2014 15:20, Ranjan1018 . 21474...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -- |diff --git a/sys/amd64/conf/X

Re: Ver 2 of the patch [was: Re: i915 driver update testing]

2014-10-07 Thread Adam McDougall
On 10/07/2014 14:01, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:44:19PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: From the same frame, please do p *(struct drm_i915_private *)(dev-private) I probably figured out what is wrong, but it is still interesting to see this piece of data. For

Re: i915 driver update testing

2014-10-06 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 08:02:59PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: K Please find at the K https://kib.kiev.ua/kib/drm/i915.1.patch K a patch which provides some updates to the i915 driver. At large, this K is import of the batch of Linux commits, and as such, it is interesting K mostly as

Re: i915 driver update testing

2014-10-06 Thread Adam McDougall
On 10/05/2014 13:00, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 11:01:14AM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: (kgdb) #0 doadump (textdump=1) at pcpu.h:219 #1 0x80661efd in kern_reboot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:447 #2 0x80662450 in panic

Re: i915 driver update testing

2014-10-06 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 07:30:20PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: On 10/05/2014 13:00, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 11:01:14AM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: (kgdb) #0 doadump (textdump=1) at pcpu.h:219 #1 0x80661efd in kern_reboot (howto=260) at

Re: i915 driver update testing

2014-10-05 Thread Adam McDougall
On 10/03/2014 13:02, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Please find at the https://kib.kiev.ua/kib/drm/i915.1.patch a patch which provides some updates to the i915 driver. At large, this is import of the batch of Linux commits, and as such, it is interesting mostly as attempt to restart the race to

Re: i915 driver update testing

2014-10-05 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 11:01:14AM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: (kgdb) #0 doadump (textdump=1) at pcpu.h:219 #1 0x80661efd in kern_reboot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:447 #2 0x80662450 in panic (fmt=value optimized out) at

Re: i915 driver update testing

2014-10-05 Thread Koop Mast
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 20:02 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: Please find at the https://kib.kiev.ua/kib/drm/i915.1.patch a patch which provides some updates to the i915 driver. At large, this is import of the batch of Linux commits, and as such, it is interesting mostly as attempt to restart

Re: i915 driver update testing

2014-10-04 Thread Ranjan1018 .
2014-10-03 19:02 GMT+02:00 Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com: Please find at the https://kib.kiev.ua/kib/drm/i915.1.patch a patch which provides some updates to the i915 driver. At large, this is import of the batch of Linux commits, and as such, it is interesting mostly as attempt to

Re: i915 driver update testing

2014-10-04 Thread Johannes Dieterich
Dear all, sorry for cross-posting (I am not subscribed to x11@). Same behavior for me (i5-3320M on a Thinkpad T430s w/ Optimus support) as reported by Maurizio. When boot switches to graphics from text mode, display remains black with backlight on. I am running the experimental xorg-stack from

bwn(4) testing

2014-10-04 Thread Justin Hibbits
Since I don't have a machine that successfully suspends/resumes, can someone test the patch at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D802 ? It shouldn't be any functional change, just removing code duplicated by bus_generic_* functions. Thanks, Justin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

BAFUG Oct 9: Kyua and jenkins testing framework

2014-10-04 Thread Craig Rodrigues
Hi, On October 9, 2014, in Mountain View, California, I will be giving a brief tech tech on: Kyua and Jenkins: Testing Framework for BSD Here are more details on the tak, plus directions to the location: http://www.meetup.com/BAFUG-Bay-Area-FreeBSD-User-Group/events/209548642/ Feel free

i915 driver update testing

2014-10-03 Thread Konstantin Belousov
Please find at the https://kib.kiev.ua/kib/drm/i915.1.patch a patch which provides some updates to the i915 driver. At large, this is import of the batch of Linux commits, and as such, it is interesting mostly as attempt to restart the race to get us more up to date Linux code imported. It might

[Testing request] Enabling x86 serial login terminals

2014-05-27 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
The attached patch enables login shells on ttyu0 if ttyu0 is a kernel console. It should preserve existing behavior (i.e. have no shell) otherwise. Testing would be appreciated. If no problem reports are received, I will commit this on Friday. Thanks! -Nathan Index: etc/etc.amd64/ttys

Re: Freebsd 11 current testing ndis / kldload: bcmwl564_sys.ko PANIC

2014-01-28 Thread Vlad Movchan
Hi Adrian, I'm sorry about this mistake. I updated original PR ( http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/165622) with the corrected patch. On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi, This doesn't compile on i386. Would you mind figuring out why that

Re: Freebsd 11 current testing ndis / kldload: bcmwl564_sys.ko PANIC

2014-01-28 Thread Adrian Chadd
Ok, I'll take a look at it tonight, thanks! -a On 28 January 2014 13:08, Vlad Movchan vladislav.movc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Adrian, I'm sorry about this mistake. I updated original PR (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/165622) with the corrected patch. On Tue, Jan 28,

Re: Freebsd 11 current testing ndis / kldload: bcmwl564_sys.ko PANIC

2014-01-27 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, This doesn't compile on i386. Would you mind figuring out why that is and submitting a patch that compiles on both amd64 and i386? Thanks! -a On 24 January 2014 12:11, Vlad Movchan vladislav.movc...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org

Re: Freebsd 11 current testing ndis / kldload: bcmwl564_sys.ko PANIC

2014-01-24 Thread Thomas Mueller
To Miguel Clara, you might try a USB wireless adapter. I use Hiro H50191, driver rsu. But you would need to do good research to find what the chip is, and which FreeBSD driver, if any, would it work with, before you buy. NDISulator looks worth trying. FreeBSD users will want to know if it

Re: Freebsd 11 current testing ndis / kldload: bcmwl564_sys.ko PANIC

2014-01-24 Thread Adrian Chadd
... who's the author of this? Why aren't they posting updates to FreeBSD-HEAD so it can be included in the base system? Does anyone have a contact email for the author, Vadislav? -a On 24 January 2014 03:52, Thomas Mueller mueller6...@bellsouth.net wrote: To Miguel Clara, you might try a USB

Re: Freebsd 11 current testing ndis / kldload: bcmwl564_sys.ko PANIC

2014-01-24 Thread Vlad Movchan
NDISulator on github (and mirror on gitorious) is a FreeBSD ndis module+binaries forked by Paul B. Mahol in 2009 (I've sent Paul's email address privately to Adrian). Almost every change in this project was made by Paul. My part is small - I've just discovered and fixed several panic/problems.

Re: Freebsd 11 current testing ndis / kldload: bcmwl564_sys.ko PANIC

2014-01-24 Thread Miguel Clara
NOTE: tried NDISulator pciconf -lv | grep -i bcm -B2 none2@pci0:13:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x145c103c chip=0x472714e4 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' device = 'BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless LAN Controller' # ndisload -p -s

Re: Freebsd 11 current testing ndis / kldload: bcmwl564_sys.ko PANIC

2014-01-24 Thread Miguel Clara
Ah.. my bad its 0x47217 not 21 :P works: ndis0: flags=8802BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 ether ac:81:12:35:79:73 nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect adhoc (autoselect adhoc) status: no

Re: Freebsd 11 current testing ndis / kldload: bcmwl564_sys.ko PANIC

2014-01-24 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 24 January 2014 08:47, Vlad Movchan vladislav.movc...@gmail.com wrote: NDISulator on github (and mirror on gitorious) is a FreeBSD ndis module+binaries forked by Paul B. Mahol in 2009 (I've sent Paul's email address privately to Adrian). Almost every change in this project was made by Paul.

Re: Freebsd 11 current testing ndis / kldload: bcmwl564_sys.ko PANIC

2014-01-24 Thread Vlad Movchan
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Is i kept up to date with -head changes? As far as I know it was kept up to date with -head changes. HI, Well, someone needs to break the fork up into pieces and submit those. The FPU change is a good candidate - but

Re: Freebsd 11 current testing ndis / kldload: bcmwl564_sys.ko PANIC

2014-01-24 Thread Adrian Chadd
Oh! The NDIS FPU patch is limited to the NDIS module. Tell you what, I'll get that committed to -HEAD soon. Would you poke the original author and see if he's willing to work with you and I on getting this stuff into -HEAD? -a ___

Re: Freebsd 11 current testing ndis / kldload: bcmwl564_sys.ko PANIC

2014-01-23 Thread Mike C.
hum... the driver I need is for broadcom 4313 wireless, It seems the modules available don't work for that one... wonder of they ever will? I would definitely prefer that to using ndis. Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: It's actually fpu code in ndis drivers. I'm going to deprecate NDIS

Re: Freebsd 11 current testing ndis / kldload: bcmwl564_sys.ko PANIC

2014-01-23 Thread Vlad Movchan
I've just tested second patch from kern/165622 - it still applies clean and runs good on recent current. If after applying this patch you trigger some other kind of panic/problem you might also want to take a look on https://github.com/NDISulator/ndisulator. Ndis module version from github differs

Re: Freebsd 11 current testing ndis / kldload: bcmwl564_sys.ko PANIC

2014-01-23 Thread Miguel Clara
Hi Adrian, when you say I'm going to deprecate NDIS, does this also mean there a change to have this driver working without ndis in freebsd? I tried kldload if_bwi kldload if_bwn But none of them work for 4313 it seems! :( On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:

Re: Freebsd 11 current testing ndis / kldload: bcmwl564_sys.ko PANIC

2014-01-23 Thread Miguel Clara
*sorry mean there a change -- mean there's a chance On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Miguel Clara miguelmcl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Adrian, when you say I'm going to deprecate NDIS, does this also mean there a change to have this driver working without ndis in freebsd? I tried kldload

Re: Freebsd 11 current testing ndis / kldload: bcmwl564_sys.ko PANIC

2014-01-23 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, yes. I'm going to deprecate NDIS and yes, this means that people using hardware that doesn't have a driver will have to go without. It sucks, but noone has stepped up to maintain NDIS and it can't work for later NDIS APIs. -a On 23 January 2014 16:54, Miguel Clara miguelmcl...@gmail.com

Re: Freebsd 11 current testing ndis / kldload: bcmwl564_sys.ko PANIC

2014-01-23 Thread Miguel Clara
Pity this is not an old laptop... I7 processor sadly a bad wifi card, gave all kinds of problems on Windows to be honest! No point on applying the patch then if it will stop working anyway! I think I might be able to substitute the card with one from another asus, unless BIOS doesn't allow me

Freebsd 11 current testing ndis / kldload: bcmwl564_sys.ko PANIC

2014-01-22 Thread Miguel Clara
Getting a panic: Unregistered use of FPU in kernel There seems to be a patch for FreeBSD 10, but not sure if it wold apply http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165622sourceid=opensearch Thanks ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Freebsd 11 current testing ndis / kldload: bcmwl564_sys.ko PANIC

2014-01-22 Thread Adrian Chadd
It's actually fpu code in ndis drivers. I'm going to deprecate NDIS this year, so .. OTOH, the FPU save support would be cool. -a On 22 January 2014 20:10, Miguel Clara miguelmcl...@gmail.com wrote: Getting a panic: Unregistered use of FPU in kernel There seems to be a patch for FreeBSD

Re: Request for testing an alternate branch

2013-12-17 Thread John Baldwin
to merge it into HEAD, hence this request. However, it does touch several drivers, turning them into early drivers, such that they can be initialized, and suspended and resumed at a different time. Saying that, I do need testing from other architectures, to make sure I haven't

Re: Request for testing an alternate branch

2013-12-14 Thread Justin Hibbits
drivers, turning them into early drivers, such that they can be initialized, and suspended and resumed at a different time. Saying that, I do need testing from other architectures, to make sure I haven't broken anything. The technical details: To get proper ordering, I've

Re: Request for testing an alternate branch

2013-12-12 Thread John Baldwin
, and suspended and resumed at a different time. Saying that, I do need testing from other architectures, to make sure I haven't broken anything. The technical details: To get proper ordering, I've extended the bus_generic_suspend() and bus_generic_resume() to do multiple passes. Devices

Re: Request for testing an alternate branch

2013-12-11 Thread Marius Strobl
be initialized, and suspended and resumed at a different time. Saying that, I do need testing from other architectures, to make sure I haven't broken anything. The technical details: To get proper ordering, I've extended the bus_generic_suspend() and bus_generic_resume() to do

Re: Request for testing an alternate branch

2013-12-11 Thread John Baldwin
to merge it into HEAD, hence this request. However, it does touch several drivers, turning them into early drivers, such that they can be initialized, and suspended and resumed at a different time. Saying that, I do need testing from other architectures, to make sure I haven't broken anything

Re: Request for testing an alternate branch

2013-12-11 Thread Justin Hibbits
testing from other architectures, to make sure I haven't broken anything. The technical details: To get proper ordering, I've extended the bus_generic_suspend() and bus_generic_resume() to do multiple passes. Devices which cannot be enabled or disabled at the current pass level would return

Re: Request for testing an alternate branch

2013-12-11 Thread Tim Kientzle
On Dec 11, 2013, at 1:26 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: Also, I'm still not a fan of the EAGAIN approach. I'd rather have a method in bus_if.m to suspend or resume a single device and to track that a device is suspended or resumed via a device_t flag or some such. (I think I had

Re: Request for testing an alternate branch

2013-12-08 Thread Marius Strobl
to merge it into HEAD, hence this request. However, it does touch several drivers, turning them into early drivers, such that they can be initialized, and suspended and resumed at a different time. Saying that, I do need testing from other architectures, to make sure I haven't broken anything

Re: Request for testing an alternate branch

2013-12-08 Thread Justin Hibbits
need testing from other architectures, to make sure I haven't broken anything. The technical details: To get proper ordering, I've extended the bus_generic_suspend() and bus_generic_resume() to do multiple passes. Devices which cannot be enabled or disabled at the current pass level

Re: Request for testing an alternate branch

2013-12-08 Thread Justin Hibbits
be initialized, and suspended and resumed at a different time. Saying that, I do need testing from other architectures, to make sure I haven't broken anything. The technical details: To get proper ordering, I've extended the bus_generic_suspend() and bus_generic_resume() to do

Re: Request for testing an alternate branch

2013-12-06 Thread Justin Hibbits
that I want to merge it into HEAD, hence this request. However, it does touch several drivers, turning them into early drivers, such that they can be initialized, and suspended and resumed at a different time. Saying that, I do need testing from other architectures, to make sure I haven't broken

Request for testing an alternate branch

2013-12-04 Thread Justin Hibbits
several drivers, turning them into early drivers, such that they can be initialized, and suspended and resumed at a different time. Saying that, I do need testing from other architectures, to make sure I haven't broken anything. The technical details: To get proper ordering, I've extended

Re: freebsd perf testing

2013-11-12 Thread George Neville-Neil
testing hardware in place, if people want to use it for these types of experiments. In the absence of a lab just for regression testing (which is also in the works) I’d suggest that prototyping be done here: https://wiki.freebsd.org/TestClusterOnePointers Anyone who is a FreeBSD committer can get

Re: freebsd perf testing

2013-11-10 Thread Julian Elischer
network perf tests but I'm not sure. He indicated that he was going to continue the daily testing but I've not seen any mention of them since. If you know who that was or how to find him let me (or gnn) know... I did a master’s thesis on this some years ago. I haven’t kept the project up-to-date, due

Re: freebsd perf testing

2013-11-10 Thread Erik Cederstrand
Den 10/11/2013 kl. 09.45 skrev Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org: it would be interesting to know what you did. and what conclusions you came to.. I created a system with a build server, a set of slaves, and a website to collect and publish the benchmark data in graphs and raw data and

Re: freebsd perf testing

2013-11-10 Thread Tim Kientzle
On Nov 10, 2013, at 1:05 PM, Erik Cederstrand erik+li...@cederstrand.dk wrote: Imagine being able to fetch a VirtualBox disk image for a random SVN commit, booting it and start debugging right away. I’ve been working on Crochet’s support for building VMWare images recently and have started

Re: freebsd perf testing

2013-11-09 Thread symbolics
graphed against time. He had them up on a website that was updated each day or so. I think they were network perf tests but I'm not sure. He indicated that he was going to continue the daily testing but I've not seen any mention of them since. If you know who

Re: freebsd perf testing

2013-11-09 Thread Erik Cederstrand
indicated that he was going to continue the daily testing but I've not seen any mention of them since. If you know who that was or how to find him let me (or gnn) know... I did a master’s thesis on this some years ago. I haven’t kept the project up-to-date, due to lack of time and hardware. Erik

Re: freebsd perf testing

2013-11-09 Thread Alan Somers
ago someone showed some freebsd performance graphs graphed against time. He had them up on a website that was updated each day or so. I think they were network perf tests but I'm not sure. He indicated that he was going to continue the daily testing but I've not seen

Re: freebsd perf testing

2013-11-09 Thread Erik Cederstrand
indicated that he was going to continue the daily testing but I've not seen any mention of them since. If you know who that was or how to find him let me (or gnn) know... I did a master’s thesis on this some years ago. I haven’t kept the project up-to-date, due to lack of time and hardware. Erik

Re: freebsd perf testing

2013-11-08 Thread Olivier Cochard-Labbé
that he was going to continue the daily testing but I've not seen any mention of them since. If you know who that was or how to find him let me (or gnn) know... Hi Julian, Perhaps you are referring to my network performance graphs on this thread: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current

Re: freebsd perf testing

2013-11-08 Thread Julian Elischer
each day or so. I think they were network perf tests but I'm not sure. He indicated that he was going to continue the daily testing but I've not seen any mention of them since. If you know who that was or how to find him let me (or gnn) know... Hi Julian, Perhaps you are referring

freebsd perf testing

2013-11-07 Thread Julian Elischer
Some time ago someone showed some freebsd performance graphs graphed against time. He had them up on a website that was updated each day or so. I think they were network perf tests but I'm not sure. He indicated that he was going to continue the daily testing but I've not seen any mention

Re: FYI: Advanced USB compliance testing tool now in the tree (10-current only)

2013-08-11 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
USB testing tool to the FreeBSD source tree. It can be used to stress your USB mass storage device in ways that are beyond what bonnie will do. See tools/tools/usbtest or the following commit: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/**changeset/base/254159http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/254159 --HPS

Re: FYI: Advanced USB compliance testing tool now in the tree (10-current only)

2013-08-10 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Hans Petter Selasky h...@bitfrost.no wrote: Hi, For those of you that want to make sure your USB mass storage device behaves correctly when using FreeBSD, typically for critical applications, I've just added an advanced USB testing tool to the FreeBSD source

FYI: Advanced USB compliance testing tool now in the tree (10-current only)

2013-08-09 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
Hi, For those of you that want to make sure your USB mass storage device behaves correctly when using FreeBSD, typically for critical applications, I've just added an advanced USB testing tool to the FreeBSD source tree. It can be used to stress your USB mass storage device in ways

NFSv4.1 server for testing/review

2013-07-21 Thread Rick Macklem
Hi, Just in case anyone is interested, I have put an experimental NFSv4.1 server in the svn repository under: projects/nfsv4.1-server It lacks required support for backchannels. However, since it never issues delegations at this point, it seems to work ok against the extant NFSv4.1 clients

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-24 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2013-02-21 07:04, Matthew Jacob mja...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2/21/2013 5:04 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: Dear All , During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . ... This in general is a good suggestion. Most companies do such automated testing as a matter of course

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-24 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Giorgos Keramidas keram...@freebsd.orgwrote: On 2013-02-21 07:04, Matthew Jacob mja...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2/21/2013 5:04 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: Dear All , During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . ... This in general

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-24 Thread Alexander Yerenkow
How about create -testing mail list, and start searching for any kind of volunteers? I could lend a hand in creating auto-testing some aspects of FreeBSD (at leas successful booting/working net/route etc), someone else probably could have to say something too. I think resources

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-24 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.comwrote: How about create -testing mail list, and start searching for any kind of volunteers? I could lend a hand in creating auto-testing some aspects of FreeBSD (at leas successful booting/working net/route etc), someone

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Daniel Kalchev
On 21.02.13 15:04, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: Dear All , During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . To my knowledge ( which may not be correct ) , at present , Tinderbox is used to only compilation correctness , means Syntax is tested . I have downloaded ftp

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Daniel Kalchev dan...@digsys.bg wrote: On 21.02.13 15:04, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: Dear All , During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . To my knowledge ( which may not be correct ) , at present , Tinderbox is used to only compilation

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Matthew Jacob
On 2/21/2013 5:04 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: Dear All , During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . ... This in general is a good suggestion. Most companies do such automated testing as a matter of course. Note however that this is a volunteer effort. Were you

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Fleuriot Damien
On Feb 21, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Daniel Kalchev dan...@digsys.bg wrote: On 21.02.13 15:04, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: Dear All , During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . To my

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Matthew Jacob mja...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2/21/2013 5:04 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: Dear All , During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . ... This in general is a good suggestion. Most companies do such automated testing as a matter

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Alexander Yerenkow
Decent testing system is a pretty complex system to be. I spent some time in this area, and gave it up, at least till better times :) But anyway, at least booting/working network stack/firewall could be easily tested with VMs. There just need to be a person dedicated to this, which is lacking now

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
, During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . To my knowledge ( which may not be correct ) , at present , Tinderbox is used to only compilation correctness , means Syntax is tested . I have downloaded ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/**FreeBSD/snapshots/amd64/amd64/** ISO

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Matthew Jacob
On 2/21/2013 7:32 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: There just need to be a person dedicated to this, which is lacking now. That is correct insofar as it goes. That's why we're not all terribly interested in suggestions about what *could* be done- just what somebody is doing.

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Matthew Jacob mja...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2/21/2013 7:32 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: There just need to be a person dedicated to this, which is lacking now. That is correct insofar as it goes. That's why we're not all terribly interested in suggestions

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.comwrote: Decent testing system is a pretty complex system to be. I spent some time in this area, and gave it up, at least till better times :) But anyway, at least booting/working network stack/firewall could be easily

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Bernhard Fröhlich
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.comwrote: Decent testing system is a pretty complex system to be. I spent some time in this area, and gave it up, at least till better times

vlan testing using etherswitchcfg

2013-02-12 Thread Yasir hussan
hi, is there anyone who knows how i can test vlan feature using *etherswitchcfg*, it tried to set and get vlan configuration for chip ar8316 it shows me right output like #etherswitchcfg port0: vlangroup: 1 media: Ethernet 1000baseT full-duplex status: active port1:

Re: vlan testing using etherswitchcfg

2013-02-12 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 12 February 2013 04:49, Yasir hussan kolya...@gmail.com wrote: hi, is there anyone who knows how i can test vlan feature using *etherswitchcfg*, it tried to set and get vlan configuration for chip ar8316 it shows me right output like Hi, There's no switch support in the arswitch driver

vlan testing using etherswitchcfg

2013-02-11 Thread Yasir hussan
hi, is there anyone who knows how i can test vlan feature using *etherswitchcfg*, it tried to set and get vlan configraton for chip ar8316 it shows me right output, but i still dont know how i should test it with its limited commands. Plz anyone who knows kindly inform me detailed setup to test

Re: [CFT] Xorg 7.7 ready for testing!

2012-07-11 Thread Michael Butler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/08/12 15:46, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: I'm created unofficial pkg repo for patched xorg tree. I'm still experimenting with it, but I already have built all required packages for CURRENT i386. Just a couple of quick notes on this since I

Re: [CFT] Xorg 7.7 ready for testing!

2012-07-08 Thread Alexander Yerenkow
required packages using ports/pkg. pkg install -x xorg\* pkg install -x xf86\* pkg install xterm Also, you can try kde4 in this repo, pkg install kde I'll provide xorg testing enthusiasts with prebuilt images for simply boot it and report any feedback in near future. -- Regards, Alexander

Re: [CFT] Xorg 7.7 ready for testing!

2012-06-13 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
such testing images, helps and advises appreciated. is this expected not to work on gma500 ? I tried and got error. no X loaded. matheus -- We will call you Cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting

Re: [CFT] Xorg 7.7 ready for testing!

2012-06-10 Thread Ivan Klymenko
В Thu, 7 Jun 2012 20:37:53 +0800 Martin Wilke m...@freebsd.org пишет: Hi Fans, The FreeBSD Xorg Team is pleased to announce Xorg 7.7 Release. We are very happy to be able to Call for testing shortly after the Xorg team annouced 7.7 release. This CFT is also open for discussion on how we

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >