Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD

2010-05-31 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 06/01/10 09:25, James R. Van Artsdalen wrote: [snip interesting history] I do suggest modifying the FreeBSD build process so that uname -a shows the compiler and its version for both the kernel and userland. Reading through this discussion, I wanted to draw attention to this footnote in

Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD

2010-05-31 Thread Doug Barton
On 05/31/10 17:46, Lawrence Stewart wrote: On 06/01/10 09:25, James R. Van Artsdalen wrote: [snip interesting history] I do suggest modifying the FreeBSD build process so that uname -a shows the compiler and its version for both the kernel and userland. Reading through this discussion, I

Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD

2010-05-31 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: On 05/31/10 17:46, Lawrence Stewart wrote: On 06/01/10 09:25, James R. Van Artsdalen wrote: [snip interesting history] I do suggest modifying the FreeBSD build process so that uname -a shows the compiler and its version

Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD

2010-05-31 Thread Andrew Reilly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 31 May 2010 17:01:15 +0100 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: Is it really such a bad thing to have gcc as a build-dependency for various ported applications? There are already ports that have gcc-4.4.4 as a dependency,

Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD

2010-05-31 Thread Steve Kargl
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 02:53:22PM +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2010 17:01:15 +0100 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: Is it really such a bad thing to have gcc as a build-dependency for various ported applications? There are already ports that have

Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD

2010-05-30 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 03:02:40PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: hi, ClangBSD was updated to LLVM/clang revision 104832 which is what we aim to import into HEAD in roughly a week. We would like the initial It was promised that before the import, the public discussion on the mailing list will

[TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD

2010-05-29 Thread Roman Divacky
. thank you for your testing! Roman Divacky on behalf of the ClangBSD team pgpUUIeD9DJPS.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: New Marvell SATA driver for testing

2010-05-04 Thread Kristof Provost
On 2010-05-04 08:11:09 (+0300), Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote: Kristof Provost wrote: I've done a quick test on my Orion (88F5182) based device. It seems to be working fine. It detects a SATA hard disk, reads/writes, ... I wasn't able to mount a filesystem from the disk but that

Re: New Marvell SATA driver for testing

2010-05-03 Thread Kristof Provost
) on arm. I haven't tested it on Gen-I chips due to lack of such hardware. Complete fresh patch for HEAD can be found here: http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/mvs.20100328.patch (make sure to run patch with -p to create directories). Testing results, comments and feedback welcome. I've done a quick

Re: New Marvell SATA driver for testing

2010-05-03 Thread Alexander Motin
Kristof Provost wrote: I've done a quick test on my Orion (88F5182) based device. It seems to be working fine. It detects a SATA hard disk, reads/writes, ... I wasn't able to mount a filesystem from the disk but that could have been me. What kind of problems? Could you confirm it? --

New Marvell SATA driver for testing

2010-04-28 Thread Alexander Motin
.20100328.patch (make sure to run patch with -p to create directories). Testing results, comments and feedback welcome. Special thanks to iXsystems, Inc. for supporting this work. -- Alexander Motin ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http

ACPI and APM testing on Dell Inspiron 8200

2003-11-22 Thread Ryan Sommers
the device you don't get acpi support...) Then test2.log is with only acpi support compiled in. Another thing I tested while I was testing was suspend states. With apm compiled in I tried doing a 'apm -z'. Suspending seems to work fine, however, when you try to bring it back it says

Re: ACPI and APM testing on Dell Inspiron 8200

2003-11-22 Thread Lukas Ertl
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, Ryan Sommers wrote: I'm having difficulty getting battery and thermal status. If I compile the kernel with APM support I get battery statistics but if I try to put APM/ACPI in the kernel ACPI reports that another PM system is enabled and doesn't load the /dev/acpi device.

Testing new sched_ule + apic -- reverting to old stable system

2003-11-05 Thread Andy Hilker
Hi, i want to test the new sources and have already cvsuped. If i make a make world and after reboot there are problems, how do i switch back to the older sources for compiling again the now running system ? (I mean not only booting the kernel.old but world, too. That is a general question)

Davicom DM910X, DM90XX card owners, please help testing

2003-08-25 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi all, I fixed yesterday the if_dc driver to make this card working again. I'm happy if you could do some testing there if the card does now work for you. I just fixed the DM9102A case, so I'm very very interested if it is also needed for the other cards. I need someone who owns a DM9102

Re: ACPI testing/debugging guide?

2003-06-17 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jun 17), Scott Lambert said: Is there some list of actions to preform and data to collect that would assist with getting the ACPI stuff lined out? I've read the acpiconf man page but don't know that it gives me any way to test for any specific functionality. I've been

Re: ACPI testing/debugging guide?

2003-06-17 Thread Barney Wolff
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 01:16:49PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: My resume from suspend doesn't work and I don't know how to tell where that is going wrong. I have no serial interface so I can't use a serial console when the LCD doesn't come on. I can live without suspend/resume

ACPI testing/debugging guide?

2003-06-17 Thread Scott Lambert
Is there some list of actions to preform and data to collect that would assist with getting the ACPI stuff lined out? I've read the acpiconf man page but don't know that it gives me any way to test for any specific functionality. I've been gradually piecing together the meaning of S1, S2, S3,

Re: ACPI testing/debugging guide?

2003-06-17 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : In the last episode (Jun 17), Scott Lambert said: : Is there some list of actions to preform and data to collect that : would assist with getting the ACPI stuff lined out? : : I've read the acpiconf man page but

Re: ACPI testing/debugging guide?

2003-06-17 Thread Barney Wolff
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:29:59PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : ACPI records temperature in tenths of a Kelvin, if you can believe it :) I don't believe that. 369.2K is 96.2C, which is over 200F. That seems to hot to me. My laptop says 2982, which is either about 30C or 15.2C. Given

Re: ACPI testing/debugging guide?

2003-06-17 Thread Hiten Pandya
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:29:59PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : In the last episode (Jun 17), Scott Lambert said: : Is there some list of actions to preform and data to collect that : would assist with getting

Re: ACPI testing/debugging guide?

2003-06-17 Thread Kevin Oberman
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 18:40:26 -0400 From: Barney Wolff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:29:59PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : ACPI records temperature in tenths of a Kelvin, if you can believe it :) I don't believe that. 369.2K is 96.2C,

Re: ACPI testing/debugging guide?

2003-06-17 Thread Scott Lambert
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 06:40:26PM -0400, Barney Wolff wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:29:59PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : ACPI records temperature in tenths of a Kelvin, if you can believe it :) I don't believe that. 369.2K is 96.2C, which is over 200F. That seems to hot to

Re: ACPI testing/debugging guide?

2003-06-17 Thread Barney Wolff
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:54:34PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: I am also seeing the same thing on my T30 when I run ACPI. It's the temperature, not any of the others. It was reading 3186 and that seems about right for centi-degrees C. (31.86C) Kelvin simply does not compute. According to

Re: ACPI testing/debugging guide?

2003-06-17 Thread Scott Lambert
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:54:13PM -0700, Hiten Pandya wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:29:59PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : ACPI records temperature in tenths of a Kelvin, if you can believe it :) I

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-06-04 Thread Paul Richards
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 06:28:26PM -0400, James Tanis wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003 17:39:18 -0400 (EDT) John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It has been committed. Build rtld with WITH_LIBMAP defined and then setup a libmap.conf. -- Alright, I compiled and installed

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-06-01 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Fri, May 30, 2003 at 17:38:04, larse (Lars Eggert) wrote about Re: Libthr stable enough for testing: LE I tried, but the following is a surefire way to freeze my SMP box solid LE at the moment (with today's libthr): SCHED_ULE or SCHED_4BSD? -netch

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-06-01 Thread Lars Eggert
Valentin Nechayev wrote: Fri, May 30, 2003 at 17:38:04, larse (Lars Eggert) wrote about Re: Libthr stable enough for testing: LE I tried, but the following is a surefire way to freeze my SMP box solid LE at the moment (with today's libthr): SCHED_ULE or SCHED_4BSD? SCHED_4BSD -- Lars Eggert

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-31 Thread Lars Eggert
Mike Makonnen wrote: I have committed some changes to libthr today. All but one of them were bug fixes, so I encourage everyone to update their source. ... I'll try to get a dump of the exact error messages when I have access to the box again in a few days. Please. I tried, but the following is

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Wesley Morgan
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Lars Eggert wrote: The machine (SMP) would sometimes freeze solid (no panic). I symlinked libc_r back to the original library, and from then on, starting gnomepanel and some other gnome pieces would fail due to errors about libthr. I couldn't find them in any log file

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Mike Makonnen
I have committed some changes to libthr today. All but one of them were bug fixes, so I encourage everyone to update their source. On Wed, 28 May 2003 22:20:19 -0700 Lars Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Makonnen wrote: Most major locking work in libthr is finished. I believe it is

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread James Tanis
How does one go about using libthr? Is all that is involved is symlinking libc_r to libthr? On Thu, 29 May 2003 17:06:52 -0400 Mike Makonnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have committed some changes to libthr today. All but one of them were bug fixes, so I encourage everyone to update their

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Michael Edenfield
* James Tanis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030529 17:18]: How does one go about using libthr? Is all that is involved is symlinking libc_r to libthr? That's the easiest way. You can also explicitly link applications with -lthr instead of -lc_r. And since libthr and libc_r are both 6 characters long,

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Thu, 29 May 2003 17:06:52 -0400 Mike Makonnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From what I understand, libthr should be a drop-in replacement for libc_r, so I was surprised to see this, but maybe I misunderstood? No, you're right. The ports must have been statically linked. I'll

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread John Baldwin
On 29-May-2003 Michael Edenfield wrote: * James Tanis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030529 17:18]: How does one go about using libthr? Is all that is involved is symlinking libc_r to libthr? That's the easiest way. You can also explicitly link applications with -lthr instead of -lc_r. And since

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Glenn Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems to be working fine on a UP machine but it locks up my SMP machine just trying to load a gnome session. It leaves an image on the screen but the keyboard and mouse stop responding and I can not ssh into the box. Same here - I get a panic in

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Glenn Johnson
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:20:02AM -0400, Mike Makonnen wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003 00:35:32 -0500 Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The real problem is in the kernel, though. A userland non-root process should not be able to hard lock the system. One of the threads people will

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Glenn Johnson wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:20:02AM -0400, Mike Makonnen wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003 00:35:32 -0500 Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The real problem is in the kernel, though. A userland non-root process should not be able to hard

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Glenn Johnson
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 03:54:22PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003, Glenn Johnson wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:20:02AM -0400, Mike Makonnen wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003 00:35:32 -0500 Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The real problem is in the

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread James Tanis
On Thu, 29 May 2003 17:39:18 -0400 (EDT) John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It has been committed. Build rtld with WITH_LIBMAP defined and then setup a libmap.conf. -- Alright, I compiled and installed libthr, built rtld WITH_LIBMAP, and created the libmap.conf. I am using

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Dan Nelson
( long line wrapped for readability ) In the last episode (May 29), James Tanis said: Alright, I compiled and installed libthr, built rtld WITH_LIBMAP, and created the libmap.conf. I am using the example from the man page to have all programs use the libthr library. As far as I can tell my

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Thu, 29 May 2003 18:28:26 -0400 James Tanis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003 17:39:18 -0400 (EDT) John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It has been committed. Build rtld with WITH_LIBMAP defined and then setup a libmap.conf. -- Alright, I compiled and

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Glenn Johnson wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 03:54:22PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003, Glenn Johnson wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:20:02AM -0400, Mike Makonnen wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003 00:35:32 -0500 Dan Nelson [EMAIL

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 29 May 2003, James Tanis wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003 17:39:18 -0400 (EDT) John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It has been committed. Build rtld with WITH_LIBMAP defined and then setup a libmap.conf. -- Alright, I compiled and installed libthr, built rtld

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread James Tanis
On Thu, 29 May 2003 20:16:33 -0400 Mike Makonnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003 18:28:26 -0400 James Tanis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a way to find out for sure that the programs are now using libthr? As far as I can tell they should be, but I'd like to have a

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread James Tanis
On Thu, 29 May 2003 20:16:33 -0400 Mike Makonnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003 18:28:26 -0400 James Tanis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a way to find out for sure that the programs are now using libthr? As far as I can tell they should be, but I'd like to have a

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Glenn Johnson
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 05:31:32PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003, Glenn Johnson wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 03:54:22PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003, Glenn Johnson wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:20:02AM -0400, Mike Makonnen wrote:

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-30 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
James Tanis wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003 17:39:18 -0400 (EDT) John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It has been committed. Build rtld with WITH_LIBMAP defined and then setup a libmap.conf. -- Alright, I compiled and installed libthr, built rtld WITH_LIBMAP, and created the libmap.conf. I am

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-29 Thread Glenn Johnson
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 06:51:10PM -0400, Mike Makonnen wrote: Hello folks, Most major locking work in libthr is finished. I believe it is stable enough now that it can be used for most applications[1]. I would appreciate it if people would try it out and report any bugs. [1] - I haven't

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-29 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Wed, 28 May 2003 21:57:35 -0500 Glenn Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems to be working fine on a UP machine but it locks up my SMP machine just trying to load a gnome session. It leaves an image on the screen but the keyboard and mouse stop responding and I can not ssh into the

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-29 Thread Lars Eggert
Mike Makonnen wrote: Most major locking work in libthr is finished. I believe it is stable enough now that it can be used for most applications[1]. I would appreciate it if people would try it out and report any bugs. I had been running with libc_r symlinked to libthr for a few days with no

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-29 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
Hi Lars. On Wed, 28 May 2003 22:20:19 -0700 Lars Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem was fixed by building/reinstalling the problematic ports without libthr symlinked into place. Can you try to use WITH_LIBMAP=YES feature in /usr/src/libexec/ rtld-elf/Makefile(SEE

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-29 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (May 29), Mike Makonnen said: On Wed, 28 May 2003 21:57:35 -0500 Glenn Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems to be working fine on a UP machine but it locks up my SMP machine just trying to load a gnome session. It leaves an image on the screen but the keyboard and

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-29 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Thu, 29 May 2003 00:35:32 -0500 Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The real problem is in the kernel, though. A userland non-root process should not be able to hard lock the system. One of the threads people will probably have to get an SMP machine to be able to debug it. Upon first

Re: Libthr stable enough for testing

2003-05-27 Thread Craig Boston
of a problem in my ten minutes of testing is that konsole seems to die with a signal 6 on startup about 50% of the time. Here's the reported backtrace: (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found

Freeze after APIC_IO: Testing 8254 interrupt delivery

2003-03-05 Thread Attila Nagy
Hello, Our newly bought Fujitsu-Siemens F250 boots with the GENERIC kernel, but with a recent, SMP-capable CURRENT it freezes after the following line: APIC_IO: Testing 8254 interrupt delivery No response to keyboard activity (I have a KVM extender on the machine, its LED blinks, it does

Re: Freeze after APIC_IO: Testing 8254 interrupt delivery

2003-03-05 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
On 2003.03.05 20:52:21 +0100, Attila Nagy wrote: Our newly bought Fujitsu-Siemens F250 boots with the GENERIC kernel, but with a recent, SMP-capable CURRENT it freezes after the following line: APIC_IO: Testing 8254 interrupt delivery I had the same problem with a FSC P250 (same motherboard

Re: Freeze after APIC_IO: Testing 8254 interrupt delivery

2003-03-05 Thread Attila Nagy
Hello, I had the same problem with a FSC P250 (same motherboard) using 4.7-REL. It works in SMP mode with a recent 4-STABLE (after MFC of HTT). It appears to only work if HyperThreading is enabled. False alarm. I switched from cvsup.freebsd.org to cvsup2.freebsd.org, updated the tree,

i386 -current make release available for testing

2003-02-28 Thread John De Boskey
Hi, I have built a i386 specific install for -current. It is available as: ftp://releng4.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/5.0-20030228-CURRENT Floppies are in the typical place. It was built using the patch below passed in as LOCAL_PATCH to the make release process. I'll leave

Re: i386 -current make release available for testing

2003-02-28 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 05:46:55AM -0500, John De Boskey wrote: Hi, I have built a i386 specific install for -current. It is available as: ftp://releng4.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/5.0-20030228-CURRENT ^^^

boot delay when testing for ata devices

2003-01-27 Thread Enache Adrian
FreeBSD used to have an irritating boot delay in 4.4. It was gone in ~4.6, never reappeared in -STABLE, but is there in -CURRENT. (I've seen it also mentioned in some vmware documentation). Applying this patch fixes it: --- /arc/freebsd/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c Sun Jan 19 23:54:13 2003 +++

Re: boot delay when testing for ata devices

2003-01-27 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Enache Adrian [EMAIL PROTECTED]: FreeBSD used to have an irritating boot delay in 4.4. It was gone in ~4.6, never reappeared in -STABLE, but is there in -CURRENT. (I've seen it also mentioned in some vmware documentation). Applying this patch fixes it: ---

Testing 5.0-rc2 (5.0-current as of 12/23/02)

2002-12-23 Thread Brendon and Wendy
All, Just a quick report - testing 5.0 rc2 on a dual xeon 2.0G (Supermicro p4dce+). Seems that if I compile the kernel with CPU greater that I486_CPU, the machine will boot, startx, be usable for a random period of time and then lock up. I dont know if the lockups occur in single CPU mode

Fwd: Re: Testing 5.0-rc2 (5.0-current as of 12/23/02)

2002-12-23 Thread Brendon and Wendy
sc0: System console at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA 16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300 vga0: Generic ISA VGA at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0 APIC_IO: Testing 8254 interrupt delivery APIC_IO: routing 8254 via IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec acpi_cpu: CPU

Testing

2002-10-29 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Hi all, Just want to say thanks for all the great work. Figure its time for me to start contributing more actively to our communities. I have the following setup, and would be happy to test some things for people not having access to an envirnment like this. Architecture 350MHz Intel PII w/

Re: Patches to dc for testing (both PCI and CardBus versions).

2002-09-28 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : This turns the following cards in my collection into working cards: : NetGear FA510 ... : Kingston KE-CB4TX (aka Fast EtheRx CardBus PC Card) : http://people.freebsd.org/~imp/patch-dc.20020926 OK. I

Patches to dc for testing (both PCI and CardBus versions).

2002-09-27 Thread M. Warner Losh
Got a cardbus card that's giving you bad ethernet addresses of the form 00:80:00:80:00 or 80:00:80:00:80 that 'dc' recognizes? If so, you should try this patch. It fixes them by doing autosizing of the srom. This code is ported from OpenBSD, but they got it (or the technique) from NetBSD's

testing point releases

2002-09-24 Thread Fergus Cameron
i'm pretty new to current so perhaps this in naive but are there any point releases for testing --- i.e. releases that are known to build properly? the reason i ask is that i've got a problem and am not a coder but essentially have no way to know whether it is worth reporting; whether

Re: testing point releases

2002-09-24 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 02:24:38PM +0100, Fergus Cameron wrote: i'm pretty new to current so perhaps this in naive but are there any point releases for testing --- i.e. releases that are known to build properly? The Developer Preview #2 should be out sometime in the next month or two. Aside

Re: Request for review testing of VFS locking patch

2002-09-20 Thread Boris Popov
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Jeff Roberson wrote: This patch touches every filesystem. I have tested with several but I would appreciate more extensive testing especially if you use one of the lesser used filesystems (ie non ufs). Please test with WITNESS and DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS enabled. If you find

Re: Request for review testing of VFS locking patch

2002-09-20 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Boris Popov wrote: On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Jeff Roberson wrote: Well, haven't tested it with smbfs, but may point that patch for nwfs contains two vref()s instead of vgetref(). Ah, thanks very much. (un?)luckily it was in debug code so it would not have been

Request for review testing of VFS locking patch

2002-09-19 Thread Jeff Roberson
that are unlocked now should be marked with mp_fixme's. This patch touches every filesystem. I have tested with several but I would appreciate more extensive testing especially if you use one of the lesser used filesystems (ie non ufs). Please test with WITNESS and DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS enabled

Re: strange netstat output on Intel pro/1000 netperf testing

2002-07-03 Thread John Polstra
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], zhang jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, When I using netperf to test Intel Pro/1000 performance, I got strange netstat output: #./netperf -H 10.0.0.2 TCP STREAM TEST to 10.0.0.2 on 10.0.0.2, I start netstat -w 1 , but got strange output: it seems

strange netstat output on Intel pro/1000 netperf testing

2002-06-29 Thread zhang jack
Hi, When I using netperf to test Intel Pro/1000 performance, I got strange netstat output: #./netperf -H 10.0.0.2 TCP STREAM TEST to 10.0.0.2 on 10.0.0.2, I start netstat -w 1 , but got strange output: it seems the link is dowm and up ceaselessly. input(Total)

wscale issue on netperf testing

2002-06-29 Thread zhang jack
Hi, I am testing giga bits NICs with netperf,two machine have the same install, but when I start netperf,using tcpdump to listen,the wscale is different. giga# tcpdump -vv -n -i em0 -c 100 tcpdump: listening on em0 19:28:35.946808 10.0.0.1.49187 10.0.0.2.12865: S [tcp sum ok] 3414289560

How can I halp out testing with Viao FX-290

2002-05-21 Thread Rob
Well, now I have -current on my Sony Viao FX-290. XFree and many other apps seem to be working OK. I am wondering if I can help test anything for Sony laptops? I have -stable on another partition, so otherwise its just a novelty. It certainly looks like a giant leap forward from -stable. I

Re: GEOM code ready for testing

2002-03-16 Thread Rasmus Skaarup
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Doug White wrote: On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Rasmus Skaarup wrote: Hmm, but I'm not sure all kinds of storage devices have serialnumbers that could be fetched (tape devices for instance?) and can we rely on the hardware manufacturers to provide unique serialnumbers?

Re: GEOM code ready for testing

2002-03-14 Thread Doug White
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Rasmus Skaarup wrote: Hmm, but I'm not sure all kinds of storage devices have serialnumbers that could be fetched (tape devices for instance?) and can we rely on the hardware manufacturers to provide unique serialnumbers? Although it's an isolated case, you do have

Re: GEOM code ready for testing

2002-03-14 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Mar 14), Doug White said: On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Rasmus Skaarup wrote: Hmm, but I'm not sure all kinds of storage devices have serialnumbers that could be fetched (tape devices for instance?) and can we rely on the hardware manufacturers to provide unique

Call for Submissions: FreeBSD 5.0 DP1 Testing Guide

2002-03-14 Thread Murray Stokely
As part of the release documentation for 5.0 DP1, we would like to provide a comprehensive testing guide. If you have code in -CURRENT that you would like to receive feedback on from the developer preview, then please submit a short email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following: 1

Re: GEOM code ready for testing

2002-03-12 Thread Rasmus Skaarup
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carl Makin writes: On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 06:34, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: The GEOM code is now ready for early testing: Would GEOM support accessing a device via multiple paths? (ie could we write a method

Re: GEOM code ready for testing

2002-03-12 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rasmus Skaarup writes: On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carl Makin writes: On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 06:34, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: The GEOM code is now ready for early testing: Would GEOM support accessing a device

Re: GEOM code ready for testing

2002-03-12 Thread Rasmus Skaarup
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rasmus Skaarup writes: On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carl Makin writes: Would GEOM support accessing a device via multiple paths? (ie could we write a method

Re: GEOM code ready for testing

2002-03-12 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rasmus Skaarup writes: Basically when a new g_provider is created it is offered to each method in turn and if that method likes it, it can stick g_geom on top of it. Ahh.. But do you rule out the possibility that two methods could apply to a g_provider? Or is

Re: GEOM code ready for testing

2002-03-12 Thread Rasmus Skaarup
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rasmus Skaarup writes: How you would recognize the same disk on thre different paths is a good question. We could implement (if we don't already have it) an ioctl/BIO_GETATTR which returns the serial number(s)

Re: GEOM code ready for testing

2002-03-12 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rasmus Skaarup writes: Well, the recognition/configuration issue is not one GEOM magically can solve for you, but GEOM promises that if you can recognize it and configure it, GEOM will not get in your way for doing what you want. But what if the name of the

Re: GEOM code ready for testing

2002-03-12 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 11:58:02 +0100, Rasmus Skaarup wrote: On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carl Makin writes: On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 06:34, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: The GEOM code is now ready for early testing: Would GEOM support

Re: GEOM code ready for testing

2002-03-12 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
FWIW, Justin and I have been thinking about (for years, actually) doing multipath support inside CAM. Actually, the multipathing support would be in new-bus and CAM would be one newbus client able to detect redundant paths and register them accordingly. The main thing to remember is that there

Re: GEOM code ready for testing

2002-03-12 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kenneth D. Merry writes: Would GEOM support accessing a device via multiple paths? (ie could we write a method that would do that?) Yes, that would be possible. FWIW, Justin and I have been thinking about (for years, actually) doing multipath support inside

Re: GEOM code ready for testing

2002-03-11 Thread Carl Makin
Hi, On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 06:34, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: The GEOM code is now ready for early testing: Would GEOM support accessing a device via multiple paths? (ie could we write a method that would do that?) My current situation is that I have a couple of IBM ESS F20 Sharks each with 3

Re: GEOM code ready for testing

2002-03-11 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carl Makin writes: Hi, On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 06:34, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: The GEOM code is now ready for early testing: Would GEOM support accessing a device via multiple paths? (ie could we write a method that would do that?) Yes, that would be possible

Non x86 KSE testing

2002-02-05 Thread Julian Elischer
Non x86 FreeBSD developers: I have posted to http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/adiff a set of 'semi-cosmetic' mechanical diffs. The effect of the diffs is to remove all the places in the code which assume that the thread structure is embedded in the process structure, without doing any major

My Recommended Development/Testing environment for -current

2001-09-07 Thread Vladimir B. Grebenschikov
THE -CURRENT KERNEL ON YOUR STABLE BOX!!! One problem - in such testing you newer see problems building world on -CURRENT, so without below patch world not builds on my -CURRENT --- src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/Makefile.inc.orig Thu May 31 15:04:52 2001 +++ src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/Makefile.inc Fri

Re: testing KSE

2001-08-31 Thread Julian Elischer
Carlo Dapor wrote: The medium I mount is a hard disk partition. /dev/ad0s1 is my win98 boot drive, /dev/ad0s2* my FreeBSD world. It has worked for almost a year, never had a crash or lost a single byte. I can go back to the kse kernel, and remount Win98, with the instructions You just

Re: testing KSE

2001-08-30 Thread Jim Bryant
I'm in the process of getting set up for testing KSE too, but I was wondering, how are you capturing the panic dump? Do you run a serial console or something to do it? Carlo Dapor wrote: can you try the same with a matching -current? I heard that msdosfs is bombing there too. (just

Re: testing KSE

2001-08-30 Thread Carlo Dapor
can you try the same with a matching -current? I heard that msdosfs is bombing there too. (just to confirm this.. if it works there but not with KSE then we have work to do :-) I build and run a kernel just before applying the patches, that was able to mount the partition and 'accepted'

Re: testing KSE

2001-08-30 Thread Julian Elischer
thanks.. I will try duplicate this tomorrow (today is shaping up to be a bad day) On Thu, 30 Aug 2001, Carlo Dapor wrote: can you try the same with a matching -current? I heard that msdosfs is bombing there too. (just to confirm this.. if it works there but not with KSE then we

Re: testing KSE

2001-08-30 Thread Julian Elischer
I can not reproduce this with a memory disk image of an msdos floppy (I do not have a floppy on that machine) can you try accessing the floppy without mounting? e.g. can you try using it as a raw device with TAR or something? Maybe it's the floppy driver rather than tehe filesystem. If you can

Re: testing KSE

2001-08-30 Thread Julian Elischer
sometimesm show panic messages from the last session too. On Thu, 30 Aug 2001, Jim Bryant wrote: I'm in the process of getting set up for testing KSE too, but I was wondering, how are you capturing the panic dump? Do you run a serial console or something to do it? Carlo Dapor wrote: can you

Re: testing KSE

2001-08-30 Thread Carlo Dapor
The medium I mount is a hard disk partition. /dev/ad0s1 is my win98 boot drive, /dev/ad0s2* my FreeBSD world. It has worked for almost a year, never had a crash or lost a single byte. I can go back to the kse kernel, and remount Win98, with the instructions You just posted. Ciao, derweil, --

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >