On 2002-09-24 18:00, Lars Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:00:45 -0700
Crist J. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not too sure about that. Now I'm getting SIGSEGV again,
You are right. There was a stupid mistake in the latest version, sorry.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 06:13:33PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
Nope, still getting it.
I was able to reproduce the crash with your config file and unpatched
GCC, however crash does not happen when I use the patch. Are you using
make buildkernel or old config/make method?
Since I'm
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 03:59:46PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:55:49 -0700
Crist J. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to have worked. Thanks.
Sorry for inconvenience, but could you please check that you got the
latest version of the patch. Both versions
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:00:45 -0700
Crist J. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not too sure about that. Now I'm getting SIGSEGV again,
You are right. There was a stupid mistake in the latest version, sorry.
Could you try yet another patch?
http://people.freebsd.org/~kan/gcc-cpp.diff
--
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 11:43:22AM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:00:45 -0700
Crist J. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not too sure about that. Now I'm getting SIGSEGV again,
You are right. There was a stupid mistake in the latest version, sorry.
Could you try yet
Nope, still getting it.
I was able to reproduce the crash with your config file and unpatched
GCC, however crash does not happen when I use the patch. Are you using
make buildkernel or old config/make method?
options IPSEC_ESP
That is killing it. If I comment out that option, I
Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:00:45 -0700
Crist J. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not too sure about that. Now I'm getting SIGSEGV again,
You are right. There was a stupid mistake in the latest version, sorry.
Could you try yet another patch?
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 11:09:56PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
I am asking people having CPP0 dying with SIG11 to try the patch at URL
below. Success/failure reports are appreciated.
http://people.freebsd.org/~kan/gcc-cpp.diff
It seems to have worked. Thanks.
--
Crist J. Clark
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:55:49 -0700
Crist J. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to have worked. Thanks.
Sorry for inconvenience, but could you please check that you got the
latest version of the patch. Both versions will fix the bug, but the
version I copied on freefall several hours ago
I've been unable to build CURRENT on STABLE for a few days. I made
sure to bring STABLE up to date. Is this just me? Is there a problem
with building CURRENT on STABLE at the moment?
--
Kernel build for GOKU started on Sat Sep 21
Works for me:
Kernel build for GENERIC completed on Sun Sep 22 07:43:35 MSD 2002
$ uname -a
FreeBSD golf.macomnet.net 4.6-20020805-MACOMNET-STABLE FreeBSD
4.6-20020805-MACOMNET-STABLE #19: Fri Sep 20 17:09:52 MSD 2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GOLF i386.
--
Maxim Konovalov,
On 2002-09-21 23:53, Crist J. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been unable to build CURRENT on STABLE for a few days. I made
sure to bring STABLE up to date. Is this just me? Is there a problem
with building CURRENT on STABLE at the moment?
It isn't just you. The same error stopped my
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 02:44:54PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2002-09-21 23:53, Crist J. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been unable to build CURRENT on STABLE for a few days. I made
sure to bring STABLE up to date. Is this just me? Is there a problem
with building CURRENT on
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 10:22:23PM +0900, I wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 02:44:54PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2002-09-21 23:53, Crist J. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been unable to build CURRENT on STABLE for a few days. I made
sure to bring STABLE up to date. Is this
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2002-09-21 23:53, Crist J. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been unable to build CURRENT on STABLE for a few days. I made
sure to bring STABLE up to date. Is this just me? Is there a problem
with building CURRENT on STABLE at the moment?
It isn't just
I am asking people having CPP0 dying with SIG11 to try the patch at URL
below. Success/failure reports are appreciated.
http://people.freebsd.org/~kan/gcc-cpp.diff
--
Alexander Kabaev
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
16 matches
Mail list logo