Re: ULE and very bad responsiveness

2003-11-14 Thread Jonathan Fosburgh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 13 November 2003 06:01 pm, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: I also could play quake(2) and have something compiling in the background but I see every new object file in form of a picture freeze. Also every other disk access seems to block

Re: ULE and very bad responsiveness

2003-11-14 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 13 November 2003 06:01 pm, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: I also could play quake(2) and have something compiling in the background but I see every new object file in form of a picture

Re: ULE and very bad responsiveness

2003-11-14 Thread Jonathan Fosburgh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 14 November 2003 01:52 pm, Jeff Roberson wrote: This does not happen with SCHED_4BSD? How fast is your system? Can you give me an example including what applications you're running and what you're compiling? I haven't tried

Re: ULE and very bad responsiveness

2003-11-14 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 14 November 2003 01:52 pm, Jeff Roberson wrote: This does not happen with SCHED_4BSD? How fast is your system? Can you give me an example including what applications you're running

Re: ULE and very bad responsiveness

2003-11-13 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: On Thursday 13 November 2003 07:17, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hi, from comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc: Kris Kennaway wrote: On 2003-11-13, Harald Schmalzbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I don't have any measurements but in my case

Re: ULE and very bad responsiveness

2003-11-13 Thread Arjan van Leeuwen
On Thursday 13 November 2003 22:25, Jeff Roberson wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: On Thursday 13 November 2003 07:17, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hi, from comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc: Kris Kennaway wrote: On 2003-11-13, Harald Schmalzbauer [EMAIL

Re: ULE and very bad responsiveness

2003-11-13 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
On Thursday 13 November 2003 22:25, Jeff Roberson wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: On Thursday 13 November 2003 07:17, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hi, from comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc: Kris Kennaway wrote: On 2003-11-13, Harald Schmalzbauer [EMAIL

ULE and very bad responsiveness

2003-11-12 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Hi, from comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc: Kris Kennaway wrote: On 2003-11-13, Harald Schmalzbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I don't have any measurements but in my case it's not neccessary at all. I built a UP kernel with ULE like Kris advised me. Are you running an up-to-date

Re: ULE and very bad responsiveness

2003-11-12 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
On Thursday 13 November 2003 07:17, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hi, from comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc: Kris Kennaway wrote: On 2003-11-13, Harald Schmalzbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I don't have any measurements but in my case it's not neccessary at all. I built a UP kernel with