Re: VN bug or pilot error ?

2001-01-25 Thread John Baldwin
On 22-Jan-01 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Hay write s: But while you're at it, migrate to md(4) instead of vn(4), it does vn(4) will be deprecated RSN. mdconfig(8) configures the md(4) devices So why not change the release process to use md instead of

Re: VN bug or pilot error ?

2001-01-22 Thread Mike Meyer
Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] types: But while you're at it, migrate to md(4) instead of vn(4), it does vn(4) will be deprecated RSN. mdconfig(8) configures the md(4) devices How close is the md rewrite to being able to replace mfs? Thanxm mike Poul-Henning In

Re: VN bug or pilot error ?

2001-01-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Meyer writes: Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] types: But while you're at it, migrate to md(4) instead of vn(4), it does vn(4) will be deprecated RSN. mdconfig(8) configures the md(4) devices How close is the md rewrite to being able to replace mfs?

VN bug or pilot error ?

2001-01-21 Thread Thierry Herbelot
Hello, I've got a recent current (cvsuped and rebuilt yesterday) on a laptop and I can't use the vn(4) pseudo-driver : I've compiled it in the kernel and I've also tried to kldload vn.ko, but I get consistently "vn0c : device not configured" when I try to use it to mount a locally stored iso

Re: VN bug or pilot error ?

2001-01-21 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2001-Jan-21 10:15:22 +0100, Thierry Herbelot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got a recent current (cvsuped and rebuilt yesterday) on a laptop and I can't use the vn(4) pseudo-driver : I've compiled it in the kernel and I've also tried to kldload vn.ko, but I get consistently "vn0c : device not

Re: VN bug or pilot error ?

2001-01-21 Thread Thierry Herbelot
thanks a lot : that was it ! Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2001-Jan-21 10:15:22 +0100, Thierry Herbelot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got a recent current (cvsuped and rebuilt yesterday) on a laptop and I can't use the vn(4) pseudo-driver : I've compiled it in the kernel and I've also tried to

Re: VN bug or pilot error ?

2001-01-21 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
But while you're at it, migrate to md(4) instead of vn(4), it does vn(4) will be deprecated RSN. mdconfig(8) configures the md(4) devices Poul-Henning In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thierry Herbelot writes: thanks a lot : that was it ! Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2001-Jan-21 10:15:22 +0100,

Re: VN bug or pilot error ?

2001-01-21 Thread Thierry Herbelot
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: But while you're at it, migrate to md(4) instead of vn(4), it does vn(4) will be deprecated RSN. mdconfig(8) configures the md(4) devices If I may, two more questions : - the 4.2 man page for vn says the file must be stored locally (I have tried vn-mounting a NFS

Re: VN bug or pilot error ?

2001-01-21 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thierry Herbelot writes: Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: But while you're at it, migrate to md(4) instead of vn(4), it does vn(4) will be deprecated RSN. mdconfig(8) configures the md(4) devices If I may, two more questions : Sorry, my misundertstanding, seing that

Re: VN bug or pilot error ?

2001-01-21 Thread John Hay
But while you're at it, migrate to md(4) instead of vn(4), it does vn(4) will be deprecated RSN. mdconfig(8) configures the md(4) devices So why not change the release process to use md instead of vn, so that we can make sure it works before vn is axed? John -- John Hay -- [EMAIL

Re: VN bug or pilot error ?

2001-01-21 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Hay write s: But while you're at it, migrate to md(4) instead of vn(4), it does vn(4) will be deprecated RSN. mdconfig(8) configures the md(4) devices So why not change the release process to use md instead of vn, so that we can make sure it works