Re: Vinum breakage (was: 2nd call for reviews and tests: buf->bio patch)

Greg Lehey wrote: > Technical explanation: A buffer header gets corrupted between the > time the top half of the driver issues the request to the disk > driver, and when the I/O completes. Currently, the evidence is > pointing towards the disk driver, but the corruption is of such an > u

Re: Vinum breakage (was: 2nd call for reviews and tests: buf->bio patch)

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greg Lehey writes: >> >> The problem in vinum/releng4 is the problem greg has been blaming >> on CAM since at least FreeBSDcon and indications seems to be that >> it is actually a malloc/free gottcha in vinum. > >No, this is not correct. The problem you're talking

Vinum breakage (was: 2nd call for reviews and tests: buf->bio patch)

On Tuesday, 4 April 2000 at 15:33:43 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message , Brad Knowles writes: >> At 8:23 AM +0200 2000/4/4, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: >> >>> Like I said in another mail, this is CURRENT, things are >>> expected to br

Vinum breakage (was: 2nd call for reviews and tests: buf->bio patch)

On Tuesday, 4 April 2000 at 15:31:00 +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Brad Knowles wrote: >> >> Like I said in a previous message, Poul broke vinum (among other >> things) under 4.0-STABLE, and this needs to be fixed ASAP. If Poul >> had kept his changes unique to -CURRENT, then 4.0-S