Re: Voodoo3 + XFree4 + DRM - simple_lock ? :-)

2001-01-31 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 31 Jan, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote: Glide Libraries: Glide3x_devel-2.2-2.i386.rpm to install; rpm2cpio Glide3x_devel-2.2-2.i386.rpm | cpio -i -d cp -r usr/include/glide3 /usr/include Shouldn't this be /usr/local/include ... Glide_V3-DRI-3.10-6.src.rpm to install; rpm2cpio

Re: Voodoo3 + XFree4 + DRM - simple_lock ? :-)

2001-01-31 Thread Andrew Kenneth Milton
+---[ Alexander Leidinger ]-- | On 31 Jan, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote: | | Glide Libraries: | | Glide3x_devel-2.2-2.i386.rpm | to install; | rpm2cpio Glide3x_devel-2.2-2.i386.rpm | cpio -i -d | cp -r usr/include/glide3 /usr/include | | Shouldn't this be

Re: Voodoo3 + XFree4 + DRM - simple_lock ? :-)

2001-01-31 Thread Andrew Atrens
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote: I've made a roadmap to getting hardware accel 3d support using a Voodoo3 under XFree-4. I've attached it in case anyone is interested. I've made some patches for this that I submitted to the XFree guys about a month ago. On the glide side,

Re: Voodoo3 + XFree4 + DRM - simple_lock ? :-)

2001-01-31 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 1 Feb, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote: Things that want glide look in only /usr/include/glide3 and /usr/lib (I suspect linuxism). For the pain it was causing it wasn't worth fretting over the location of a few files and a directory If I was making a port I'd probably make the effort

Voodoo3 + XFree4 + DRM - simple_lock ? :-)

2001-01-30 Thread Andrew Kenneth Milton
I've made a roadmap to getting hardware accel 3d support using a Voodoo3 under XFree-4. I've attached it in case anyone is interested. However, recently simple_lock and friends seem to have disappeared, and the kernel modules make some use of them (although there is still reference to it in

Re: Voodoo3 + XFree4 + DRM - simple_lock ? :-)

2001-01-30 Thread Jason Evans
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 04:54:30AM +1000, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote: However, recently simple_lock and friends seem to have disappeared, and the kernel modules make some use of them (although there is still reference to it in machine/smptests.h) It looked like I could replace them with

Re: Voodoo3 + XFree4 + DRM - simple_lock ? :-)

2001-01-30 Thread Julian Elischer
Jason Evans wrote: On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 04:54:30AM +1000, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote: However, recently simple_lock and friends seem to have disappeared, and the kernel modules make some use of them (although there is still reference to it in machine/smptests.h) It looked like I

Re: Voodoo3 + XFree4 + DRM - simple_lock ? :-)

2001-01-30 Thread Jason Evans
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 01:18:05PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: Jason Evans wrote: Mutexes should be used in places where simplelocks were used. With few exceptions, sleep mutexes should be used (even though simplelocks were spin locks). See mutex(9) for details. Be forewarned that

Voodoo3 + XFree4 + DRM - simple_lock ? :-)

2001-01-30 Thread Stephen Hocking
Hey, I've been fooling with this (and Glide3) but under FBSD 4.2. Didn't have the time or inclination to do it under the latest current. Good to see someone's been crazy^Wbrave enough to try. It'd bee really nice if someone could make the kernel modules part of the current tree, the same way