On Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:47:05 MST, Doug wrote:
> How does that PR explain why rc5des with the same ini file is
> running at nice 20 on -current, seemingly without idprio and running
> at nice 0 on -stable, seemingly with it?
Um, different nice levels. I didn't see that. Trigger happy. :-(
: How does that PR explain why rc5des with the same ini file is running at
:nice 20 on -current, seemingly without idprio and running at nice 0 on
:-stable, seemingly with it? I'm aware of the discussion related to that PR,
:an both systems were built after Bruce committed that fix.
:
:Doug
Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
> On Sat, 21 Aug 1999 19:11:33 MST, Doug wrote:
>
> > I have a 3.2-Stable and a 4.0-Current system at home, both
> > running rc5des. On both systems I set the priority in the rc5 options
> > menu to '0', indicating lowest possible priority. On the -Stable
> > system
On Sat, 21 Aug 1999 19:11:33 MST, Doug wrote:
> I have a 3.2-Stable and a 4.0-Current system at home, both
> running rc5des. On both systems I set the priority in the rc5 options
> menu to '0', indicating lowest possible priority. On the -Stable
> system it's running at nice level '0', b
I have a 3.2-Stable and a 4.0-Current system at home, both running rc5des.
On both systems I set the priority in the rc5 options menu to '0',
indicating lowest possible priority. On the -Stable system it's running at
nice level '0', but it seems to be taking advantage of the idprio stuff
s
