What's the least required in base to be functional?

2014-11-10 Thread Chris H
Apologies. That may not have been the best choice of titles. What I'm trying to determine, is what is the very least I will require in base, to actually build a userland build environment. NOTE; this all concerns -CURRENT (recent 11). Point being, while I recognize that clang/llvm is the default

Re: What's the least required in base to be functional?

2014-11-10 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 10 Nov 2014, at 19:54, Chris H bsd-li...@bsdforge.com wrote: Apologies. That may not have been the best choice of titles. What I'm trying to determine, is what is the very least I will require in base, to actually build a userland build environment. NOTE; this all concerns -CURRENT

Re: What's the least required in base to be functional?

2014-11-10 Thread Chris H
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 20:28:00 +0100 Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote On 10 Nov 2014, at 19:54, Chris H bsd-li...@bsdforge.com wrote: Apologies. That may not have been the best choice of titles. What I'm trying to determine, is what is the very least I will require in base, to

Re: What's the least required in base to be functional?

2014-11-10 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 10 Nov 2014, at 21:04, Chris H bsd-li...@bsdforge.com wrote: On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 20:28:00 +0100 Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote ... Note that you can delete WITHOUT_CLANG from your make.conf, just like other WITH_ and WITHOUT_ settings. These only belong in src.conf. -Dimitry

Re: What's the least required in base to be functional?

2014-11-10 Thread Chris H
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 21:16:46 +0100 Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote On 10 Nov 2014, at 21:04, Chris H bsd-li...@bsdforge.com wrote: On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 20:28:00 +0100 Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote ... Note that you can delete WITHOUT_CLANG from your make.conf, just like