Ok, a couple of witness complains, first about the sound driver, I
think, and the second something macish. Then a backtrace for a mac_mls
panic. All this for your weekend entertainment. :-)
First, witness cmi:
backtrace(c032e7d9,c25af500,c25a98d4,c046236e,c04623ec) at backtrace+0x17
witness_lo
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> backtrace(c032e7d9,c25af500,c25a98d4,c046236e,c04623ec) at
> backtrace+0x17
>
> witness_lock(c25af500,8,c04623ec,1b8,c) at witness_lock+0x660
> _mtx_lock_flags(c25af500,0,c04623ec,1b8,8095) at
> _mtx_lock_flags+0xb1 chn_intr(c25a9880,c,1,208
Revised patch without typo attached.
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Associates Laboratories
Index: tcp_subr.c
===
RCS file: /data/fbsd-cvs/ncvs/src/sys/netinet/tcp
Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
>
> > backtrace(c032e7d9,c25af500,c25a98d4,c046236e,c04623ec) at
> > backtrace+0x17
> >
> > witness_lock(c25af500,8,c04623ec,1b8,c) at witness_lock+0x660
> > _mtx_lock_flags(c25af500,0,c04623ec,1b8,8095) at
> > _mtx_lock_fl
No bugs so far with this.
Robert Watson wrote:
Revised patch without typo attached.
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Associates Laboratories
Index: tcp_subr.c
===
RCS
Ok, I've committed it. Saw your other panic message, hope to look more
closely today.
BTW, you might consider running with the mac_test module, as it's intended
to help diagnose label problems through additional assertions.
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
[EM
Robert Watson wrote:
Ok, I've committed it. Saw your other panic message, hope to look more
closely today.
BTW, you might consider running with the mac_test module, as it's intended
to help diagnose label problems through additional assertions.
Oh. That was not clear to me. I thought it was a modu
Now I think I was premature. It seems there is something unmacish in
this kernel. Sigh. Well, I'll test with a recent source.
Robert Watson wrote:
Ok, I've committed it. Saw your other panic message, hope to look more
closely today.
BTW, you might consider running with the mac_test module, as it
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Robert Watson wrote:
> > Ok, I've committed it. Saw your other panic message, hope to look more
> > closely today.
> >
> > BTW, you might consider running with the mac_test module, as it's intended
> > to help diagnose label problems through additi
