On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 23:00, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 21:14, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:28:51PM -0400, Wesley Morgan wrote:
I know there is some work being done on the recent signal changes to fix
some things, but are we sure this is the problem? I
* De: Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-10-19 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: X problems 5.0... -RELEASE? ]
From the reports:
Both stable and current users get the self-healing hang, where the X
server responds to nothing but the mouse moves, and at some minutes
later time it continues
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Juli Mallett wrote:
Note that during these, mp3s keep playing, gtk-gnutella keeps downloading
things, etc., it seems X just isn't updating the display... Even a resize
of a sizable gtk frame I did while it was frozen took affect when it
unfroze... Have you tried loggign
Note that during these, mp3s keep playing, gtk-gnutella keeps downloading
things, etc., it seems X just isn't updating the display... Even a resize
But, it's not always so. For me most of the time everything stops.
Including playing mp3s/oggs, resizing windows and so on. And after some
time
* De: Marc Recht [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-10-19 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: X problems 5.0... -RELEASE? ]
Note that during these, mp3s keep playing, gtk-gnutella keeps downloading
things, etc., it seems X just isn't updating the display... Even a resize
But, it's not always so. For me
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:39:26PM +1000, Tim Robbins wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:00:46PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[...]
Did anyone test -current with the various FP test suites people posted
about last week?
I run some of them
Tim Robbins writes:
It's worth noting that 4.7-RELEASE (w/ gcc 2.95.4) fails *more* test cases
than -CURRENT when -O is used to compile paranoia.
Does 2.95.4 fail the same tests or different ones?
Also, this program doesn't deal with signals, which is where I suspect
the problem may
Kris Kennaway writes:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:28:51PM -0400, Wesley Morgan wrote:
I know there is some work being done on the recent signal changes to fix
some things, but are we sure this is the problem? I would hate to see
release schedules pushed back because these problems
On 13 Oct 2002 23:00:08 -0700
Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could anyone who is having stability issues with X please email me
privately if they are using either -current before September or
-stable? If not, without some sort of hints of where an issue really
is, I'm going to chalk
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Given that it (apparently) happens on X servers compiled months ago,
my gut feeling is that it is a bug in the kernel floating point
context save/restore in the presence of signals.
I still can't run X without crashing the *kernel* because of the
Nate Lawson writes:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Given that it (apparently) happens on X servers compiled months ago,
my gut feeling is that it is a bug in the kernel floating point
context save/restore in the presence of signals.
I still can't run X without
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:58:26PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Nate Lawson writes:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Given that it (apparently) happens on X servers compiled months ago,
my gut feeling is that it is a bug in the kernel floating point
context
Kris Kennaway writes:
I think we're all waiting for Julian and Jonathan Mini to fix this..
It would probably help if they had some sort of a test program that
could duplicate the bug in a controlled setting without a lot of
confusing application software running..
Did anyone
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:00:46PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[...]
Did anyone test -current with the various FP test suites people posted
about last week?
Yes. I ran paranoia from http://cm.bell-labs.com/netlib/paranoia/ and
found that FP arithmethic is satisfactory when -O is not used, and
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:39:26PM +1000, Tim Robbins wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:00:46PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[...]
Did anyone test -current with the various FP test suites people posted
about last week?
Yes. I ran paranoia from http://cm.bell-labs.com/netlib/paranoia/
The last tentative date for 5.0-RELEASE I have seen is late November,
early December... This does seem odd since I haven't seen a DP2, but...
Quite a few people seem to be having serious problems with XFree86 for 3-4
weeks, everything from sig 6's, the bezier crashes, to strange freezes
that
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:28:51PM -0400, Wesley Morgan wrote:
I know there is some work being done on the recent signal changes to fix
some things, but are we sure this is the problem? I would hate to see
release schedules pushed back because these problems are lost in the
noise, and I
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:28:51PM -0400, Wesley Morgan wrote:
I know there is some work being done on the recent signal changes to fix
some things, but are we sure this is the problem? I would hate to see
release schedules pushed back because
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:28:51PM -0400, Wesley Morgan wrote:
I know there is some work being done on the recent signal changes to fix
some things, but are we sure this is the problem? I would hate to see
release schedules pushed back because these problems are lost
On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 21:14, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:28:51PM -0400, Wesley Morgan wrote:
I know there is some work being done on the recent signal changes to fix
some things, but are we sure this is the problem? I would hate to see
release schedules pushed back
20 matches
Mail list logo
