__FreeBSD_version bump for loss of perl

2002-05-16 Thread Ade Lovett
Could we have a __FreeBSD_version bump for the diking out of perl from the base system please? A chunk of ports work needs to be done to conditionally use perl vs sed for in-line replacements on lots of Makefiles. Thanks, -aDe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: __FreeBSD_version bump for loss of perl

2002-05-16 Thread Maxime Henrion
Ade Lovett wrote: Could we have a __FreeBSD_version bump for the diking out of perl from the base system please? A chunk of ports work needs to be done to conditionally use perl vs sed for in-line replacements on lots of Makefiles. I agree that a __FreeBSD_version bump is appropriate, but

Re: __FreeBSD_version bump for loss of perl

2002-05-16 Thread Ade Lovett
On 05/16/02 17:46, Maxime Henrion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree that a __FreeBSD_version bump is appropriate, but why not always simply use sed for this ? Because not everyone using the ports system has the in-place editing feature of sed that was recently added, and thus it needs to be

Re: __FreeBSD_version bump for loss of perl

2002-05-16 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:52:45PM -0500, Ade Lovett wrote: On 05/16/02 17:46, Maxime Henrion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree that a __FreeBSD_version bump is appropriate, but why not always simply use sed for this ? Because not everyone using the ports system has the in-place editing

Re: __FreeBSD_version bump for loss of perl

2002-05-16 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
Ade == Ade Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ade Because not everyone using the ports system has the in-place Ade editing feature of sed that was recently added, and thus it Ade needs to be conditional on ${OSVERSION}. Why can't we use ed for in-place edits? --lyndon To

Re: __FreeBSD_version bump for loss of perl

2002-05-16 Thread David O'Brien
[bogus From: address, because people cannot be bothered to respect Reply-To:] On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:17:44PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: Why can't we use ed for in-place edits? perl -pi.hold -e 's/FOO/BAR/g' ${WRKSRC}/a/b/{X,Y} is not as easy to do with `ed'. People should find

Re: __FreeBSD_version bump for loss of perl

2002-05-16 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
perl -pi.hold -e 's/FOO/BAR/g' ${WRKSRC}/a/b/{X,Y} is not as easy to do with `ed'. It's not *that* hard. 10 lines of shell script is preferable to XX MB of perl bloat. Especially for this sort of problem. --lyndon To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: __FreeBSD_version bump for loss of perl

2002-05-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:17:44PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: Ade == Ade Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ade Because not everyone using the ports system has the in-place Ade editing feature of sed that was recently added, and thus it Ade needs to be conditional on