APM problems with 5.0-20001112-CURRENT

2000-11-15 Thread Claes Leufven
Hi I have a Compaq Armada E500 and the apm support doesnt work. It seems that the kernel doesnt find the apm controller just that it is on the pci bus. I am using freebsd 5.0-20001112-current and have tried with both the generic kernel and my custom kernel. in the kernel configuration I have

Re: followup to apm problems.

1999-09-01 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Tue, 31 Aug 1999 15:16:48 -0700, Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Actually, that's almost entirely system-dependant. The BIOS may well poll the keyboard controller/USB controller, for example. And designs based on the Intel PIIX4 will generate SMI# interrupts for whichever activities

Re: followup to apm problems.

1999-09-01 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Garrett Wollman writes: On Tue, 31 Aug 1999 15:16:48 -0700, Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Actually, that's almost entirely system-dependant. The BIOS may well poll the keyboard controller/USB controller, for example. And designs based on the Intel PIIX4

Re: followup to apm problems.

1999-09-01 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Smith writes: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Garrett Wollman writes: On Tue, 31 Aug 1999 15:16:48 -0700, Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Actually, that's almost entirely system-dependant. The BIOS may well poll the keyboard controller/USB controller,

Re: followup to apm problems.

1999-09-01 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Smith writes: : It's reasonable to assume this, yes. However it's also worth bearing : in mind that since the BIOS isn't using these interrupts to _detect_ : activity, turning them off is pretty pointless. Then why does the key up event cause the suspend to

Re: followup to apm problems.

1999-09-01 Thread Mike Smith
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Smith writes: : It's reasonable to assume this, yes. However it's also worth bearing : in mind that since the BIOS isn't using these interrupts to _detect_ : activity, turning them off is pretty pointless. Then why does the key up event cause the

Re: followup to apm problems.

1999-08-31 Thread Nate Williams
: And it seems there still are other devices which wake your PC up in : 2-3 mins time. : Hmmm, anyone has ideas? I think we need to set the interrupt mask to 0 in the PIC. I don't think makes any difference, since the APM Bios is in charge of what happens at this point, and the BIOS is

Re: followup to apm problems.

1999-08-31 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nate Williams writes: : I think we need to set the interrupt mask to 0 in the PIC. : : I don't think makes any difference, since the APM Bios is in charge of : what happens at this point, and the BIOS is below the level of the OS. : The theory is that no more

Re: followup to apm problems.

1999-08-31 Thread Mike Smith
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nate Williams writes: : I think we need to set the interrupt mask to 0 in the PIC. : : I don't think makes any difference, since the APM Bios is in charge of : what happens at this point, and the BIOS is below the level of the OS. : The theory is that no

Re: followup to apm problems.

1999-08-29 Thread Mike Muir
Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: OK. Probably `slept 00:00:00 - 00:00:40' problem was caused by PS/2 mouse, I think. Do we need something to do with psm on suspending as well as resuming? Im not sure anything needs to be done for PS/2.. check out these results.. ed1: NE2000 PCI Ethernet

Re: followup to apm problems.

1999-08-29 Thread Mike Muir
Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote: The PS/2 mouse generates interrupt when /dev/psm0 is open and the user moves the mouse. If you are running moused or X when you suspend the system, /dev/psm0 is left open and might generate interrupts. I think modern motherboard BIOSes have a setup menu that lists

Re: followup to apm problems.

1999-08-24 Thread Nick Hibma
/standby now should be issued with delay. - Delay for suspend/standby can be adjusted by using sysctl(8) interface (eg. sysctl -w machdep.apm_suspend_delay=3). On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Mike Muir wrote: Ive been following the apm problems and changes in apm threads in hope that I would fix

Re: followup to apm problems.

1999-08-24 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
Hi, I'd like to have full output of dmesg to investigate hardware interference in apm. Could you send me it later? 'apm -Z' for standby jumps into standby mode for like.. an instant, then comes right back out (while playing mp3) [snip] 'zzz' or 'apm -z' for suspend jumps into suspend mode,

followup to apm problems.

1999-08-23 Thread Mike Muir
Ive been following the apm problems and changes in apm threads in hope that I would fix the problems that I too am having. I am using the latest sources for apm, apmconf and apmd, as well as the kernel. (as of 23/8/99, NZST, which is yesterday evening) dmesg is: apm0: APM BIOS on motherboard

Re: apm problems.

1999-08-22 Thread Kelvin Farmer
Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: Ah, If you want to reject the standby request from BIOS while the system is active, then apmd would be useful. You can configure it like this: in /etc/apmd.conf: apm_event PMEV_STANDBYREQ { reject; Thanks. I guess your disks are still in a SLEEP after a

Re: apm problems.

1999-08-21 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
Hi, sorry to late. 1. Standby by PM timer in BIOS setting fails with the system activity. If by fails you mean enters standby mode, then yes the computer enters standby mode while the system is active, after the period of time set in the bios, as long as no keys have been pressed on the

Re: apm problems.

1999-08-16 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
Hi, My understanding on your problems is: 1. Standby by PM timer in BIOS setting fails with the system activity. 2. No new process can be started after resume. Is it correct? 1. My laptops also fails if the console or window is updating by the output from running commands. But standby on

apm problems.

1999-08-14 Thread Kelvin Farmer
Hi, Apm does not seem to be behaving correctly on my computer (running yesterday's CURRENT) eg: with a make world running, the following happens after about 15 mins of not touching the keyboard. Received APM Event: PMEV_STANDBYREQ Execute APM hook "pcm suspend handler" Called APM sound suspend