Re: bridge(4) and IPv6 broken?

2024-01-03 Thread Lexi Winter
Patrick M. Hausen: > > Am 02.01.2024 um 13:56 schrieb Jan Bramkamp : > > IPv6 enabled interfaces need a link-local address for normal > > operation. Please set the auto-linklocal flag on the bridge and try > > again. > > And remove the link-local address from alc0. A bridge member must not have >

Re: bridge(4) and IPv6 broken?

2024-01-02 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi all, > Am 02.01.2024 um 13:56 schrieb Jan Bramkamp : > > IPv6 enabled interfaces need a link-local address for normal operation. > Please set the auto-linklocal flag on the bridge and try again. And remove the link-local address from alc0. A bridge member must not have any layer 3 addresses

Re: bridge(4) and IPv6 broken?

2024-01-02 Thread Jan Bramkamp
On 02.01.24 00:40, Lexi Winter wrote: hello, i'm having an issue with bridge(4) and IPv6, with a configuration which is essentially identical to a working system running releng/14.0. ifconfig: lo0: flags=1008049 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=680003 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask

Re: bridge(4) and IPv6 broken?

2024-01-01 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Am 2024-01-02 00:40, schrieb Lexi Winter: hello, i'm having an issue with bridge(4) and IPv6, with a configuration which is essentially identical to a working system running releng/14.0. ifconfig: lo0: flags=1008049 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=680003 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask

bridge(4) and IPv6 broken?

2024-01-01 Thread Lexi Winter
hello, i'm having an issue with bridge(4) and IPv6, with a configuration which is essentially identical to a working system running releng/14.0. ifconfig: lo0: flags=1008049 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=680003 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128