On Mon, 8 Feb 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
This does not make any operational change except to get rid
of the $conf_dir junk from rc.conf, which I originally put
in to try to bootstrap rc.diskless.
A much better way to do rc.diskless was suggested to me,
which I'm going
On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 08:14:55PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
This does not make any operational change except to get rid
of the $conf_dir junk from rc.conf, which I originally put
in to try to bootstrap rc.diskless.
A much better way to do rc.diskless was suggested to me,
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999 16:00:54 +0100, Eivind Eklund eiv...@freebsd.org said:
A much better way to do rc.diskless was suggested to me,
which I'm going to implement. It involves retargeting
the /conf/ME softlink by mount_union'ing a small MFS
Union mounts do not work, and I believe they are
: the /conf/ME softlink by mount_union'ing a small MFS
:
: Union mounts do not work, and I believe they are some distance from
: working (unless you have better patches than I do, of course).
:
:Last I checked, union mounts work just fine, thank you very much.
:unionfs (which should have been
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999 09:24:12 -0800 (PST), Matthew Dillon
dil...@apollo.backplane.com said:
union mounts are broken. I must have panic'd my test box 50 times
trying to get them to work.
Fortunately I found another way using the less sophisticated
-o union type of mount
That
Matthew Dillon dil...@apollo.backplane.com writes:
union mounts are broken. I must have panic'd my test box 50 times
trying to get them to work.
Nonono. The union filesystem ('mount -t union') is broken. Union
mounts ('mount -o union') are not.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav -
:Matthew Dillon dil...@apollo.backplane.com writes:
: union mounts are broken. I must have panic'd my test box 50 times
: trying to get them to work.
:
:Nonono. The union filesystem ('mount -t union') is broken. Union
:mounts ('mount -o union') are not.
:
:DES
:--
:Dag-Erling Smorgrav -
Fortunately I found another way using the less sophisticated
-o union type of mount ( verses the more sophisticated mount_union ).
Well, there are problems here too. I had /var/mail mounted with -o union
from another host. My own, local, mailbox would get corrupted every once
in a while
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Fortunately I found another way using the less sophisticated
-o union type of mount ( verses the more sophisticated mount_union ).
Well, there are problems here too. I had /var/mail mounted with -o union
from another host. My own,
: Well, there are problems here too. I had /var/mail mounted with -o union
: from another host. My own, local, mailbox would get corrupted every once
: in a while -- lots of \0, some other strings. 16K in size.
:
: This is on 3.0-RELEASE, with NFSv3. The server is Solaris.
:
:There were several
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Garrett Wollman wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999 16:00:54 +0100, Eivind Eklund eiv...@freebsd.org said:
A much better way to do rc.diskless was suggested to me,
which I'm going to implement. It involves retargeting
the /conf/ME softlink by mount_union'ing a small MFS
*
This does not make any operational change except to get rid
of the $conf_dir junk from rc.conf, which I originally put
in to try to bootstrap rc.diskless.
A much better way to do rc.diskless was suggested to me,
which I'm going to implement. It involves retargeting
the
12 matches
Mail list logo
