On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Alexander N. Kabaev wrote:
> Actually, it seems that Java borrowed a whole lot of ideas from Modula-3. And
> C++ experience can even hurt instead helping when switching to Java. Java
> inherits some parts of C++ syntax but is based on rather different design.
That statement,
Actually, it seems that Java borrowed a whole lot of ideas from Modula-3. And
C++ experience can even hurt instead helping when switching to Java. Java
inherits some parts of C++ syntax but is based on rather different design.
On 19-Apr-00 Donn Miller wrote:
> Donn
To Unsubscribe: send mail t
> >> This happened to me when I was using cvsup-bin. I didn't want all of the
> >> modula overhead. Any ideas?
> >
> > It's not modula any more !!!
>
> Eh? Sure it is. It would be too much work to rewrite it in a
> different language.
Oops, I meant it's not the same version of modula :-/
>
> Brian Somers wrote:
> >
> > [John cc'd]
> >
> > Can (both of) you try the source distribution ?
>
> > > This happened to me when I was using cvsup-bin. I didn't want all of the
> > > modula overhead. Any ideas?
> >
> > It's not modula any more !!!
>
> Was it re-written in C or C++? Or, h
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't know here to send this, but I thought that other people trying
> to keep current might have had this problem before:
>
> When I run cvsup with the default cvsup file from
> /usr/share/examples/cvsup/cvs-supfile (after pu
John Polstra wrote:
>
> Brian Somers wrote:
> > It's not modula any more !!!
>
> Eh? Sure it is. It would be too much work to rewrite it in a
> different language.
I was curious as to why you chose modula. Were you used to using the
language, or did it seem like the best choice for cvsup?
Brian Somers wrote:
> [John cc'd]
>
> Can (both of) you try the source distribution ?
>
> I was having a problem on cvsup2.uk.FreeBSD.org where clients kept
> getting disconnected. The problem went away (it seems) after I
> installed the source port (install ports/net/cvsup before
> cvsup-mi
Brian Somers wrote:
>
> [John cc'd]
>
> Can (both of) you try the source distribution ?
> > This happened to me when I was using cvsup-bin. I didn't want all of the
> > modula overhead. Any ideas?
>
> It's not modula any more !!!
Was it re-written in C or C++? Or, how about this -- a versi
[John cc'd]
Can (both of) you try the source distribution ?
I was having a problem on cvsup2.uk.FreeBSD.org where clients kept
getting disconnected. The problem went away (it seems) after I
installed the source port (install ports/net/cvsup before
cvsup-mirror).
I'm an advocate of the ``sou
This happened to me when I was using cvsup-bin. I didn't want all of the
modula overhead. Any ideas?
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Stephen J. Roznowski wrote:
> On 17 Apr, Jason wrote:
> > I didn't know here to send this, but I thought that other people trying
> > to ke
On 17 Apr, Jason wrote:
> I didn't know here to send this, but I thought that other people trying
> to keep current might have had this problem before:
>
> When I run cvsup with the default cvsup file from
> /usr/share/examples/cvsup/cvs-supfile (after putting in the correct cvsup
> server addres
I didn't know here to send this, but I thought that other people trying
to keep current might have had this problem before:
When I run cvsup with the default cvsup file from
/usr/share/examples/cvsup/cvs-supfile (after putting in the correct cvsup
server address) it crashes:
bash-2.03# cvsup cvs
12 matches
Mail list logo
