On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 02:47:37PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 10:38:35 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:56:06AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Monday, April 09, 2012 4:05:29 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 0
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 10:38:35 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:56:06AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Monday, April 09, 2012 4:05:29 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 03:36:08PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > > On Monday, April 09, 2012
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:56:06AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, April 09, 2012 4:05:29 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 03:36:08PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Monday, April 09, 2012 3:10:00 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 11:
On Monday, April 09, 2012 4:05:29 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 03:36:08PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Monday, April 09, 2012 3:10:00 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 11:01:03AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > > On Saturday, April 07, 2012
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 03:36:08PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, April 09, 2012 3:10:00 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 11:01:03AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Saturday, April 07, 2012 11:08:41 pm Warner Losh wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Apr 7, 2012, at 8:46
On Monday, April 09, 2012 3:10:00 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 11:01:03AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Saturday, April 07, 2012 11:08:41 pm Warner Losh wrote:
> > >
> > > On Apr 7, 2012, at 8:46 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 15:50 +0300,
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 11:01:03AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Saturday, April 07, 2012 11:08:41 pm Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 7, 2012, at 8:46 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 15:50 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > >> Hello,
> > >> there seems to be a problem
On Apr 9, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 17:59 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 08:41:15AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 06:58 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 09:10:55PM -0600, Warner Losh
On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 17:59 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 08:41:15AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 06:58 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 09:10:55PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Apr 7, 2012, at 8:57 A
On Saturday, April 07, 2012 11:08:41 pm Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Apr 7, 2012, at 8:46 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 15:50 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> there seems to be a problem with device attach sequence offered by
newbus.
> >> Basically, when device
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 08:41:15AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 06:58 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 09:10:55PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> > >
> > > On Apr 7, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:
On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 06:58 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 09:10:55PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 7, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:46:41AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > >> On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 15:50 +030
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 17:57 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:46:41AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 15:50 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > there seems to be a problem with device attach sequence offered by newbus.
> > > Basically
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 09:10:55PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Apr 7, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:46:41AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 15:50 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>> there seems to be a probl
On Apr 7, 2012, at 3:34 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 4/7/12 8:15 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 10:04:59AM -0500, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>>> On 04/07/12 07:50, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Hello,
there seems to be a problem with device attach sequence offere
On Apr 7, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:46:41AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
>> On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 15:50 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> there seems to be a problem with device attach sequence offered by newbus.
>>> Basically, when devic
On Apr 7, 2012, at 9:04 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> On 04/07/12 07:50, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> Hello,
>> there seems to be a problem with device attach sequence offered by newbus.
>> Basically, when device attach method is executing, device is not fully
>> initialized yet. Also the device
On Apr 7, 2012, at 8:46 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 15:50 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> Hello,
>> there seems to be a problem with device attach sequence offered by newbus.
>> Basically, when device attach method is executing, device is not fully
>> initialized yet. Also
On 4/7/12 8:15 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 10:04:59AM -0500, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 04/07/12 07:50, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Hello,
there seems to be a problem with device attach sequence offered by newbus.
Basically, when device attach method is executing, devi
On 4/7/12 5:50 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Hello,
there seems to be a problem with device attach sequence offered by newbus.
Basically, when device attach method is executing, device is not fully
initialized yet. Also the device state in the newbus part of the world
is DS_ALIVE. There is defin
On 04/07/12 10:15, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 10:04:59AM -0500, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 04/07/12 07:50, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Hello,
there seems to be a problem with device attach sequence offered by newbus.
Basically, when device attach method is executing, devi
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 10:04:59AM -0500, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> On 04/07/12 07:50, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> >Hello,
> >there seems to be a problem with device attach sequence offered by newbus.
> >Basically, when device attach method is executing, device is not fully
> >initialized yet. Als
On 04/07/12 07:50, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Hello,
there seems to be a problem with device attach sequence offered by newbus.
Basically, when device attach method is executing, device is not fully
initialized yet. Also the device state in the newbus part of the world
is DS_ALIVE. There is defin
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:46:41AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 15:50 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > Hello,
> > there seems to be a problem with device attach sequence offered by newbus.
> > Basically, when device attach method is executing, device is not fully
> > initia
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 15:50 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> Hello,
> there seems to be a problem with device attach sequence offered by newbus.
> Basically, when device attach method is executing, device is not fully
> initialized yet. Also the device state in the newbus part of the world
> is
Hello,
there seems to be a problem with device attach sequence offered by newbus.
Basically, when device attach method is executing, device is not fully
initialized yet. Also the device state in the newbus part of the world
is DS_ALIVE. There is definitely no shattering news in the statements,
but
26 matches
Mail list logo
