Re: ed0/probe solved (Was: re: ed0/probe problem in 4.0-CURRENT)

1999-05-19 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Steven Ames wrote: > > *sigh* No suprise here. As 90% of these things are this was yet > another Dumb User Error. I had a base address conflict that kept > the card from being probed. So, can we say it was due? ;-) -- Daniel C. Sobral(8-DCS) d...@newsguy.com d...@freebsd.

ed0/probe solved (Was: re: ed0/probe problem in 4.0-CURRENT)

1999-05-18 Thread Steven Ames
*sigh* No suprise here. As 90% of these things are this was yet another Dumb User Error. I had a base address conflict that kept the card from being probed. Thanks for everyone's help. As always FreeBSD is working just great! -Steve To Unsubscrib

Re: ed0/probe problem in 4.0-CURRENT

1999-05-18 Thread Steven Ames
.. > >> > >> > >> Brandon Hicks - Gate Keeper Technologies > >> "Trixster" > >> bhi...@gatekeep.net > >> > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Steven Ames > >> To: freebsd-hack...@freebsd.or

Re: ed0/probe problem in 4.0-CURRENT

1999-05-18 Thread Steven Ames
> > device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 net irq 10 iomem 0xd8000 > > You should probably show the list what device lines you are using for > current, since config barfs on the above line under current: > > config: line 52: `net' interrupt label obsolete Fair enough: device ed1 at isa? port 0x280 irq 1

ed0/probe problem in 4.0-CURRENT

1999-05-18 Thread Steven Ames
Last night switched from 3.1 to 4.0. Smooth transition. The only error I've seen is one of my ethernet cards is no longer detected. In the previous kernel (3.1-STABLE) I had the following config line: device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 net irq 10 iomem 0xd8000 When the system booted it would detect