Re: follow up on acpi issue

2003-01-27 Thread Bryan Liesner
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote: > > Thanks, Nate. When you suggested that I remove the apm stuff fron the > > kernel, you meant ALL of the apm stuff, didn't you :) . I took a > > second look and found I still had viapm and its requirements stil

Re: follow up on acpi issue

2003-01-27 Thread Peter Hessler
I have viapm, smb, and acpi enabled on my system, and console is not gone. It works just fine. I can [ctrl-alt]-F[1-8] as normal and xdm works just fine. I can get a dmesg and kernel config if people want it. On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:36:18PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: : On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Br

Re: follow up on acpi issue

2003-01-27 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote: > Thanks, Nate. When you suggested that I remove the apm stuff fron the > kernel, you meant ALL of the apm stuff, didn't you :) . I took a > second look and found I still had viapm and its requirements still in > the config file. The system boots fine no