Re: freezing... update to 1.45 of ffs_softdep.c

2000-01-12 Thread Joao Pedras
I'm am not using neither softupdates nor scsi on this machine only ide, nic de, s3 Matthew Dillon wrote: >:> I would like to know if the person reporting the getblk lockup (I think >:> it was Poul) sees that problem solved with the vinum fix that Alfred >:> posted in regards to or wh

Re: freezing... update to 1.45 of ffs_softdep.c

2000-01-10 Thread Alexander Litvin
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon writes: >>I would like to know if the person reporting the getblk lockup (I think >>it was Poul) sees that problem solved with the vinum fix that Alfred >>posted in regards to or whether we stil

Re: freezing... update to 1.45 of ffs_softdep.c

2000-01-10 Thread Matthew Dillon
The following patch should fix the problem temporarily until Kirk can dig into it and figure out what went wrong. -Matt Index: sys/contrib//softupdates/ffs_softdep.c === RCS file: /Fre

Re: freezing... update to 1.45 of ffs_softdep.c

2000-01-10 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000110 15:13] wrote: > ::still a problem, just got snagged a few moments ago, there's a traceback > ::already on the way. :) > :: > ::-Alfred > : > :Is this backed by the ata driver too? > : > :If so, if either you or Poul could backoff to the wd drive

Re: freezing... update to 1.45 of ffs_softdep.c

2000-01-10 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon writes: >If so, if either you or Poul could backoff to the wd driver and see >if the problem continues, I would appreciate it. I disabled softupdates and the problem went away. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member [EMAIL

Re: freezing... update to 1.45 of ffs_softdep.c

2000-01-10 Thread Matthew Dillon
::still a problem, just got snagged a few moments ago, there's a traceback ::already on the way. :) :: ::-Alfred : :Is this backed by the ata driver too? : :If so, if either you or Poul could backoff to the wd driver and see :if the problem continues, I would appreciate it. I was

Re: freezing... update to 1.45 of ffs_softdep.c

2000-01-10 Thread Matthew Dillon
:> I would like to know if the person reporting the getblk lockup (I think :> it was Poul) sees that problem solved with the vinum fix that Alfred :> posted in regards to or whether we still have an open issue. : :still a problem, just got snagged a few moments ago, there's a traceback

Re: freezing... update to 1.45 of ffs_softdep.c

2000-01-10 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon writes: >I would like to know if the person reporting the getblk lockup (I think >it was Poul) sees that problem solved with the vinum fix that Alfred >posted in regards to or whether we still have an open issue. I don't use vinum and -c

Re: freezing... update to 1.45 of ffs_softdep.c

2000-01-10 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000110 14:09] wrote: > > :I've reproduced the softupdates ftruncate panic and have a core dump > :to play with. > : > : -Matt > > Ok, Kirk fixed the softupdates ftruncate panic last night. Make sure >

Re: freezing... update to 1.45 of ffs_softdep.c

2000-01-10 Thread Matthew Dillon
:I've reproduced the softupdates ftruncate panic and have a core dump :to play with. : : -Matt Ok, Kirk fixed the softupdates ftruncate panic last night. Make sure you have version 1.45 of sys/contrib/softupdates/ffs_softdep.c I