I'd be interested in the general policy on LINKS vs. SYMLINKS
between directories that might end up on different file systems.
There seems to be an assumption that system directories in /usr
(e.g. /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /usr/libexec) are on the same file
system, but I do not think that this assumpti
On 01/02/13 07:04, Stefan Esser wrote:
> I'd be interested in the general policy on LINKS vs. SYMLINKS
> between directories that might end up on different file systems.
>
> There seems to be an assumption that system directories in /usr
> (e.g. /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /usr/libexec) are on the same fi
Am 02.01.2013 14:26, schrieb Nathan Whitehorn:
> On 01/02/13 07:04, Stefan Esser wrote:
>> I'd be interested in the general policy on LINKS vs. SYMLINKS
>> between directories that might end up on different file systems.
>>
>> There seems to be an assumption that system directories in /usr
>> (e.g.
On 01/02/13 13:26, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> Thanks for the patch! I've committed it (slightly modified) as r244958.
> I haven't taken any action on the chgrp/chown issue, though.
Similarly, 'make distribution' fails when /root is a separate filesystem:
cd /usr/src/etc/root; install -o root -g w
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Matt Burke wrote:
> On 01/02/13 13:26, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>> Thanks for the patch! I've committed it (slightly modified) as r244958.
>> I haven't taken any action on the chgrp/chown issue, though.
>
> Similarly, 'make distribution' fails when /root is a separa
