On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Bruce Evans wrote:
> > Well, the kernel just doesn't treat it specially, so it gets counted in the
> > load average. I'm not sure if the interrupt and other kernel processes
> > are counted. Since they do useful work, they should be. The idle process
Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Valentin Nechayev wrote:
>
> > > > `top -I' output:
> > > >
> > > > ==={
> > > > last pid: 811; load averages: 1.01, 0.97, 0.67up 0+00:16:12 23:26:26
> > >
> > > This is because the idle process is always running (see "ps lax" outout).
> > > Pe
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Valentin Nechayev wrote:
> > > `top -I' output:
> > >
> > > ==={
> > > last pid: 811; load averages: 1.01, 0.97, 0.67up 0+00:16:12 23:26:26
> >
> > This is because the idle process is always running (see "ps lax" outout).
> > Perhaps the bug is that top doesn't s
Hello Bruce Evans!
Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 03:09:02, bde wrote about "Re: load average is 1 when no
processes active; etc.":
> > `top -I' output:
> >
> > ==={
> > last pid: 811; load averages: 1.01, 0.97, 0.67up 0+00:16:12 23:26:26
>
&g
Just for the record, i here have a system cvsupped and built
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Sat Sep 9 13:46:17 CEST 2000
which has a constant load average of 1.00 and higher in uptime, top, and
systat.
The load is already 1.00 or above when the first shell prompt after a boot
appears. I've al
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Valentin Nechayev wrote:
> `top -I' output:
>
> ==={
> last pid: 811; load averages: 1.01, 0.97, 0.67up 0+00:16:12 23:26:26
This is because the idle process is always running (see "ps lax" outout).
Perhaps the bug is that top doesn't show the idle process or othe
System in question is:
root@nn:~##uname -mrs
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386
root@nn:~##grep FreeBSD_version /usr/include/sys/param.h
#undef __FreeBSD_version
#define __FreeBSD_version 500012/* Master, propagated to newvers */
root@nn:~##
cvsup was Sep 8, approximately at 18:00 GMT.
`top -I' o
