Re: make concurrency kit a module

2017-05-19 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On 05/19/17 17:34, Adrian Chadd wrote: On 17 May 2017 at 23:37, Warner Losh wrote: On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 06:04:09PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10778 Except there

Re: make concurrency kit a module

2017-05-19 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 17 May 2017 at 23:37, Warner Losh wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 06:04:09PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: >>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10778 >>> >> >> Except there are plans to use it

Re: make concurrency kit a module

2017-05-18 Thread Warner Losh
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 06:04:09PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10778 >> > > Except there are plans to use it elsewhere. Many areas may be improved using > it. > > Having it as a module

Re: make concurrency kit a module

2017-05-17 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 06:04:09PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10778 > Except there are plans to use it elsewhere. Many areas may be improved using it. Having it as a module would mean some devs might refrain from using it because there is no waranty for it to be

Re: make concurrency kit a module

2017-05-17 Thread Adrian Chadd
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10778 -a On 17 May 2017 at 17:46, Adrian Chadd wrote: > hi, > > this is a quick change that makes concurrency_kit a module. Right now > the only thing using it is linuxkpi so it's all dead code on > non-linuxkpi platforms. > > > > -adrian

make concurrency kit a module

2017-05-17 Thread Adrian Chadd
hi, this is a quick change that makes concurrency_kit a module. Right now the only thing using it is linuxkpi so it's all dead code on non-linuxkpi platforms. -adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list