[ Reply-to: set back to list ]
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:50:24PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
> There is something dodgy with the crunchgen stuff that leaves behind
> .o files compiled with the wrong -DFOO defines. Result is things that
> don't link properly much later.
Correct. Our crunch
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:50:24PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
> Scott Long writes:
> > Bruce Cran wrote:
> > > There appears to be a breakage of 'rerelease' - that is, 'release' works, but
> > > 'rerelease' fails in telnetd. After fixing the Makefile for the gcc -Os
> > > build, the build failed
Mark Murray wrote:
Scott Long writes:
Bruce Cran wrote:
There appears to be a breakage of 'rerelease' - that is, 'release' works, but
'rerelease' fails in telnetd.
I saw this too, but couldn't verify that it wasn't due to other problems
that I was experiencing. Mark, can you take a glance at this?
Scott Long writes:
> Bruce Cran wrote:
> > There appears to be a breakage of 'rerelease' - that is, 'release' works, but
> > 'rerelease' fails in telnetd. After fixing the Makefile for the gcc -Os
> > build, the build failed in /usr/src/contrib/telnet/telnetd/authenc.c and ext.h.
> > I have sinc
Bruce Cran wrote:
There appears to be a breakage of 'rerelease' - that is, 'release' works, but
'rerelease' fails in telnetd. After fixing the Makefile for the gcc -Os
build, the build failed in /usr/src/contrib/telnet/telnetd/authenc.c and ext.h.
I have since verified that the 'release' succeed
There appears to be a breakage of 'rerelease' - that is, 'release' works, but
'rerelease' fails in telnetd. After fixing the Makefile for the gcc -Os
build, the build failed in /usr/src/contrib/telnet/telnetd/authenc.c and ext.h.
I have since verified that the 'release' succeeds when the 'rerele
