memset prototype changed?

2003-02-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
A number of ports have started failing due to an incompatible memset prototype. Did someone recently change this? e.g. http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-latest/netatalk-1.6.0_1,1.log Kris msg52652/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: memset prototype changed?

2003-02-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-latest/netatalk-1.6.0_1,1.log The code that fails to compile is blatantly wrong: memset(schedule, 0, sizeof(schedule)); DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: memset prototype changed?

2003-02-18 Thread Richard Nyberg
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:01:29PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-latest/netatalk-1.6.0_1,1.log The code that fails to compile is blatantly wrong: memset(schedule, 0, sizeof(schedule)); I think

Re: memset prototype changed?

2003-02-18 Thread Jacques A. Vidrine
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:01:29PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-latest/netatalk-1.6.0_1,1.log The code that fails to compile is blatantly wrong: memset(schedule, 0, sizeof(schedule)); I wouldn't

Re: memset prototype changed?

2003-02-18 Thread Jacques A. Vidrine
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:10:41AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:47:35PM +0100, Richard Nyberg wrote: On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:01:29PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Re: memset prototype changed?

2003-02-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:47:35PM +0100, Richard Nyberg wrote: On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:01:29PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-latest/netatalk-1.6.0_1,1.log The code that fails to compile is

Re: memset prototype changed?

2003-02-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Jacques A. Vidrine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:01:29PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: The code that fails to compile is blatantly wrong: memset(schedule, 0, sizeof(schedule)); I wouldn't say `blantantly'. The expressions `schedule' and `schedule' are

Re: memset prototype changed?

2003-02-18 Thread Jacques A. Vidrine
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 08:55:02PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Jacques A. Vidrine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:01:29PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: The code that fails to compile is blatantly wrong: memset(schedule, 0, sizeof(schedule)); I

Re: memset prototype changed?

2003-02-18 Thread Terry Lambert
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Jacques A. Vidrine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:01:29PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: The code that fails to compile is blatantly wrong: memset(schedule, 0, sizeof(schedule)); I wouldn't say `blantantly'. The expressions