A number of ports have started failing due to an incompatible memset
prototype. Did someone recently change this?
e.g.
http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-latest/netatalk-1.6.0_1,1.log
Kris
msg52652/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-latest/netatalk-1.6.0_1,1.log
The code that fails to compile is blatantly wrong:
memset(schedule, 0, sizeof(schedule));
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:01:29PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-latest/netatalk-1.6.0_1,1.log
The code that fails to compile is blatantly wrong:
memset(schedule, 0, sizeof(schedule));
I think
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:01:29PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-latest/netatalk-1.6.0_1,1.log
The code that fails to compile is blatantly wrong:
memset(schedule, 0, sizeof(schedule));
I wouldn't
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:10:41AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:47:35PM +0100, Richard Nyberg wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:01:29PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:47:35PM +0100, Richard Nyberg wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:01:29PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-latest/netatalk-1.6.0_1,1.log
The code that fails to compile is
Jacques A. Vidrine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:01:29PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
The code that fails to compile is blatantly wrong:
memset(schedule, 0, sizeof(schedule));
I wouldn't say `blantantly'. The expressions `schedule' and
`schedule' are
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 08:55:02PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Jacques A. Vidrine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:01:29PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
The code that fails to compile is blatantly wrong:
memset(schedule, 0, sizeof(schedule));
I
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Jacques A. Vidrine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:01:29PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
The code that fails to compile is blatantly wrong:
memset(schedule, 0, sizeof(schedule));
I wouldn't say `blantantly'. The expressions
